kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Marian Rotariu" <marian.c.rotariu@gmail.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v7 36/78] KVM: introduce VM introspection
Date: Fri,  7 Feb 2020 20:15:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207181636.1065-37-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207181636.1065-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

The KVM introspection subsystem provides a facility for applications to
control the execution of other VMs (pause, resume, shutdown), query the
state of the vCPUs (GPRs, MSRs etc.), alter the page access bits in the
shadow page tables and receive notifications when events of interest
have taken place (shadow page table level faults, key MSR writes,
hypercalls etc.). Some notifications can be responded to with an action
(like preventing an MSR from being written), others are mere informative
(like breakpoint events which can be used for execution tracing).

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Marian Rotariu <marian.c.rotariu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marian Rotariu <marian.c.rotariu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst   | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig              |   9 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/Makefile             |   2 +
 include/linux/kvm_host.h          |   2 +
 include/linux/kvmi_host.h         |  23 +++++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c     |  25 ++++++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h |   7 ++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c               |  13 +++
 8 files changed, 221 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
 create mode 100644 include/linux/kvmi_host.h
 create mode 100644 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
 create mode 100644 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..af685e837b4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=========================================================
+KVMI - The kernel virtual machine introspection subsystem
+=========================================================
+
+The KVM introspection subsystem provides a facility for applications running
+on the host or in a separate VM, to control the execution of other VMs
+(pause, resume, shutdown), query the state of the vCPUs (GPRs, MSRs etc.),
+alter the page access bits in the shadow page tables (only for the hardware
+backed ones, eg. Intel's EPT) and receive notifications when events of
+interest have taken place (shadow page table level faults, key MSR writes,
+hypercalls etc.). Some notifications can be responded to with an action
+(like preventing an MSR from being written), others are mere informative
+(like breakpoint events which can be used for execution tracing).
+With few exceptions, all events are optional. An application using this
+subsystem will explicitly register for them.
+
+The use case that gave way for the creation of this subsystem is to monitor
+the guest OS and as such the ABI/API is highly influenced by how the guest
+software (kernel, applications) sees the world. For example, some events
+provide information specific for the host CPU architecture
+(eg. MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP) merely because its leveraged by guest software
+to implement a critical feature (fast system calls).
+
+At the moment, the target audience for KVMI are security software authors
+that wish to perform forensics on newly discovered threats (exploits) or
+to implement another layer of security like preventing a large set of
+kernel rootkits simply by "locking" the kernel image in the shadow page
+tables (ie. enforce .text r-x, .rodata rw- etc.). It's the latter case that
+made KVMI a separate subsystem, even though many of these features are
+available in the device manager (eg. QEMU). The ability to build a security
+application that does not interfere (in terms of performance) with the
+guest software asks for a specialized interface that is designed for minimum
+overhead.
+
+API/ABI
+=======
+
+This chapter describes the VMI interface used to monitor and control local
+guests from a user application.
+
+Overview
+--------
+
+The interface is socket based, one connection for every VM. One end is in the
+host kernel while the other is held by the user application (introspection
+tool).
+
+The initial connection is established by an application running on the host
+(eg. QEMU) that connects to the introspection tool and after a handshake the
+socket is passed to the host kernel making all further communication take
+place between it and the introspection tool. The initiating party (QEMU) can
+close its end so that any potential exploits cannot take a hold of it.
+
+The socket protocol allows for commands and events to be multiplexed over
+the same connection. As such, it is possible for the introspection tool to
+receive an event while waiting for the result of a command. Also, it can
+send a command while the host kernel is waiting for a reply to an event.
+
+The kernel side of the socket communication is blocking and will wait for
+an answer from its peer indefinitely or until the guest is powered off
+(killed), restarted or the peer goes away. Obviously, whether the guest
+can really continue normal execution depends on whether the introspection
+tool has made any modifications that require an active KVMI channel.
+
+Handshake
+---------
+
+Although this falls out of the scope of the introspection subsystem, below
+is a proposal of a handshake that can be used by implementors.
+
+Based on the system administration policies, the management tool
+(eg. libvirt) starts device managers (eg. QEMU) with some extra arguments:
+what introspection tool could monitor/control that specific guest (and
+how to connect to) and what introspection commands/events are allowed.
+
+The device manager will connect to the introspection tool and wait for a
+cryptographic hash of a cookie that should be known by both peers. If the
+hash is correct (the destination has been "authenticated"), the device
+manager will send another cryptographic hash and random salt. The peer
+recomputes the hash of the cookie bytes including the salt and if they match,
+the device manager has been "authenticated" too. This is a rather crude
+system that makes it difficult for device manager exploits to trick the
+introspection tool into believing its working OK.
+
+The cookie would normally be generated by a management tool (eg. libvirt)
+and make it available to the device manager and to a properly authenticated
+client. It is the job of a third party to retrieve the cookie from the
+management application and pass it over a secure channel to the introspection
+tool.
+
+Once the basic "authentication" has taken place, the introspection tool
+can receive information on the guest (its UUID) and other flags (endianness
+or features supported by the host kernel).
+
+In the end, the device manager will pass the file handle (plus the allowed
+commands/events) to KVM, and forget about it. It will be notified by
+KVM when the introspection tool closes the file handle (in case of
+errors), and should reinitiate the handshake.
+
+Unhooking
+---------
+
+During a VMI session it is possible for the guest to be patched and for
+some of these patches to "talk" with the introspection tool. It thus
+becomes necessary to remove them before the guest is suspended, moved
+(migrated) or a snapshot with memory is created.
+
+The actions are normally performed by the device manager. In the case
+of QEMU, it will use another ioctl to notify the introspection tool and
+wait for a limited amount of time (a few seconds) for a confirmationthat
+is OK to proceed.
+
+Live migrations
+---------------
+
+Before the live migration takes place, the introspection tool has to be
+notified and have a chance to unhook (see **Unhooking**).
+
+The QEMU instance on the receiving end, if configured for KVMI, will need to
+establish a connection to the introspection tool after the migration has
+completed.
+
+Obviously, this creates a window in which the guest is not
+introspected. The user will need to be aware of this detail.
+Future introspection technologies can choose not to disconnect and instead
+transfer the necessary context to the introspection tool at the migration
+destination via a separate channel.
+
+Memory access safety
+--------------------
+
+The KVMI API gives access to the entire guest physical address space but
+provides no information on which parts of it are system RAM and which are
+device-specific memory (DMA, emulated MMIO, reserved by a passthrough
+device etc.). It is up to the user to determine, using the guest operating
+system data structures, the areas that are safe to access (code, stack, heap
+etc.).
+
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
index 840e12583b85..78b3580b5601 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -96,6 +96,15 @@ config KVM_MMU_AUDIT
 	 This option adds a R/W kVM module parameter 'mmu_audit', which allows
 	 auditing of KVM MMU events at runtime.
 
+config KVM_INTROSPECTION
+	bool "KVM Introspection"
+	depends on KVM && (KVM_INTEL || KVM_AMD)
+	default n
+	help
+	  Provides the introspection interface, which allows the control
+	  of any running VM. It must be explicitly enabled by setting
+	  the module parameter 'kvm.introspection'.
+
 # OK, it's a little counter-intuitive to do this, but it puts it neatly under
 # the virtualization menu.
 source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig"
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile b/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
index b19ef421084d..53b3579c2900 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
@@ -3,10 +3,12 @@
 ccflags-y += -Iarch/x86/kvm
 
 KVM := ../../../virt/kvm
+KVMI := $(KVM)/introspection
 
 kvm-y			+= $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o \
 				$(KVM)/eventfd.o $(KVM)/irqchip.o $(KVM)/vfio.o
 kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF)	+= $(KVM)/async_pf.o
+kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION) += $(KVMI)/kvmi.o
 
 kvm-y			+= x86.o emulate.o i8259.o irq.o lapic.o \
 			   i8254.o ioapic.o irq_comm.o cpuid.o pmu.o mtrr.o \
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index d3bc4351344f..862dc45f971f 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
 
 #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
 
+#include <linux/kvmi_host.h>
+
 #ifndef KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID
 #define KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID KVM_MAX_VCPUS
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/kvmi_host.h b/include/linux/kvmi_host.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8cd613fdd4f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/kvmi_host.h
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+#ifndef __KVMI_HOST_H
+#define __KVMI_HOST_H
+
+struct kvm;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
+
+int kvmi_init(void);
+void kvmi_uninit(void);
+void kvmi_create_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
+void kvmi_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
+
+#else
+
+static inline int kvmi_init(void) { return 0; }
+static inline void kvmi_uninit(void) { }
+static inline void kvmi_create_vm(struct kvm *kvm) { }
+static inline void kvmi_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm) { }
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
+
+#endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c74ddb8075cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KVM introspection
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2017-2020 Bitdefender S.R.L.
+ *
+ */
+#include "kvmi_int.h"
+
+int kvmi_init(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void kvmi_uninit(void)
+{
+}
+
+void kvmi_create_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+}
+
+void kvmi_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+}
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..34af926f9838
--- /dev/null
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __KVMI_INT_H__
+#define __KVMI_INT_H__
+
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+
+#endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 20ffc86fd8d1..d33065665e22 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ unsigned int halt_poll_ns_shrink;
 module_param(halt_poll_ns_shrink, uint, 0644);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(halt_poll_ns_shrink);
 
+static bool enable_introspection;
+module_param_named(introspection, enable_introspection, bool, 0644);
+
 /*
  * Ordering of locks:
  *
@@ -739,6 +742,9 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(unsigned long type)
 	if (r)
 		goto out_err;
 
+	if (enable_introspection)
+		kvmi_create_vm(kvm);
+
 	mutex_lock(&kvm_lock);
 	list_add(&kvm->vm_list, &vm_list);
 	mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
@@ -791,6 +797,7 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 	int i;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = kvm->mm;
 
+	kvmi_destroy_vm(kvm);
 	kvm_uevent_notify_change(KVM_EVENT_DESTROY_VM, kvm);
 	kvm_destroy_vm_debugfs(kvm);
 	kvm_arch_sync_events(kvm);
@@ -4439,6 +4446,11 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
 	r = kvm_vfio_ops_init();
 	WARN_ON(r);
 
+	if (enable_introspection) {
+		r = kvmi_init();
+		WARN_ON(r);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_unreg:
@@ -4463,6 +4475,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_init);
 
 void kvm_exit(void)
 {
+	kvmi_uninit();
 	debugfs_remove_recursive(kvm_debugfs_dir);
 	misc_deregister(&kvm_dev);
 	kmem_cache_destroy(kvm_vcpu_cache);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-07 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-07 18:15 [RFC PATCH v7 00/78] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/78] sched/swait: add swait_event_killable_exclusive() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/78] export kill_pid_info() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/78] KVM: add new error codes for VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/78] KVM: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/78] KVM: add kvm_get_max_gfn() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/78] KVM: doc: fix the hypercall numbering Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/78] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_get_regs() and kvm_arch_vcpu_get_sregs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/78] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_regs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/78] KVM: x86: avoid injecting #PF when emulate the VMCALL instruction Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/78] KVM: x86: add .bp_intercepted() to struct kvm_x86_ops Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/78] KVM: x86: add .control_cr3_intercept() " Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/78] KVM: x86: add .cr3_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/78] KVM: x86: add .control_desc_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/78] KVM: x86: add .desc_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/78] KVM: x86: export .msr_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/78] KVM: x86: use MSR_TYPE_R, MSR_TYPE_W and MSR_TYPE_RW with AMD code too Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/78] KVM: svm: pass struct kvm_vcpu to set_msr_interception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/78] KVM: vmx: pass struct kvm_vcpu to the intercept msr related functions Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/78] KVM: x86: add .control_msr_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/78] KVM: x86: vmx: use a symbolic constant when checking the exit qualifications Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/78] KVM: x86: save the error code during EPT/NPF exits handling Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/78] KVM: x86: add .fault_gla() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/78] KVM: x86: add .spt_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/78] KVM: x86: add .gpt_translation_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/78] KVM: x86: add .control_singlestep() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/78] KVM: x86: export kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/78] KVM: x86: extend kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_system() with the 'access' parameter Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/78] KVM: x86: export kvm_inject_pending_exception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 29/78] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 30/78] KVM: x86: page track: provide all page tracking hooks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 31/78] KVM: x86: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 32/78] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 33/78] KVM: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 34/78] KVM: x86: intercept the write access on sidt and other emulated instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 35/78] KVM: x86: disable gpa_available optimization for fetch and page-walk NPF/EPT violations Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 37/78] KVM: introspection: add hook/unhook ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 38/78] KVM: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 39/78] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 40/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 41/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 42/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 43/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 44/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 45/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_READ_PHYSICAL/KVMI_VM_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 46/78] KVM: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 47/78] KVM: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 48/78] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU introspection requests Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 49/78] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU commands Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 50/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 51/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_PAUSE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 52/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 53/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 54/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 55/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 56/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 57/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 58/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 59/78] KVM: introspection: restore the state of #BP interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 60/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 61/78] KVM: introspection: restore the state of CR3 interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 62/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 63/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_MAX_GFN Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 64/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 65/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 66/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 67/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 68/78] KVM: introspection: restore the state of descriptor interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 69/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 70/78] KVM: introspection: restore the state of MSR interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 71/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 72/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 73/78] KVM: introspection: extend KVMI_GET_VERSION with struct kvmi_features Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 74/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 75/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 76/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_TRANSLATE_GVA Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 77/78] KVM: introspection: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 78/78] KVM: x86: call the page tracking code on emulation failure Adalbert Lazăr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200207181636.1065-37-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marian.c.rotariu@gmail.com \
    --cc=mdontu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).