From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 11/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state SGI callbacks
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 20:33:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200304203330.4967-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304203330.4967-1-maz@kernel.org>
To implement the get/set_irqchip_state callbacks (limited to the
PENDING state), we have to use a particular set of hacks:
- Reading the pending state is done by using a pair of new redistributor
registers (GICR_VSGIR, GICR_VSGIPENDR), which allow the 16 interrupts
state to be retrieved.
- Setting the pending state is done by generating it as we'd otherwise do
for a guest (writing to GITS_SGIR).
- Clearing the pending state is done by emiting a VSGI command with the
"clear" bit set.
This requires some interesting locking though:
- When talking to the redistributor, we must make sure that the VPE
affinity doesn't change, hence taking the VPE lock.
- At the same time, we must ensure that nobody accesses the same
redistributor's GICR_VSGI*R registers for a different VPE, which
would corrupt the reading of the pending bits. We thus take the
per-RD spinlock. Much fun.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 14 ++++++
2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index c93f178914ee..fb2b836c31ff 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -3962,11 +3962,84 @@ static int its_sgi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
return -EINVAL;
}
+static int its_sgi_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
+ enum irqchip_irq_state which,
+ bool state)
+{
+ if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (state) {
+ struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct its_node *its = find_4_1_its();
+ u64 val;
+
+ val = FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VPEID, vpe->vpe_id);
+ val |= FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VINTID, d->hwirq);
+ writeq_relaxed(val, its->sgir_base + GITS_SGIR - SZ_128K);
+ } else {
+ its_configure_sgi(d, true);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int its_sgi_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
+ enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool *val)
+{
+ struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ void __iomem *base;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ u32 count = 1000000; /* 1s! */
+ u32 status;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Locking galore! We can race against two different events:
+ *
+ * - Concurent vPE affinity change: we must make sure it cannot
+ * happen, or we'll talk to the wrong redistributor. This is
+ * identical to what happens with vLPIs.
+ *
+ * - Concurrent VSGIPENDR access: As it involves accessing two
+ * MMIO registers, this must be made atomic one way or another.
+ */
+ cpu = vpe_to_cpuid_lock(vpe, &flags);
+ raw_spin_lock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
+ base = gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_base + SZ_128K;
+ writel_relaxed(vpe->vpe_id, base + GICR_VSGIR);
+ do {
+ status = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_VSGIPENDR);
+ if (!(status & GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY))
+ goto out;
+
+ count--;
+ if (!count) {
+ pr_err_ratelimited("Unable to get SGI status\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+ cpu_relax();
+ udelay(1);
+ } while(count);
+
+out:
+ raw_spin_unlock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
+ vpe_to_cpuid_unlock(vpe, flags);
+ *val = !!(status & (1 << d->hwirq));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct irq_chip its_sgi_irq_chip = {
.name = "GICv4.1-sgi",
.irq_mask = its_sgi_mask_irq,
.irq_unmask = its_sgi_unmask_irq,
.irq_set_affinity = its_sgi_set_affinity,
+ .irq_set_irqchip_state = its_sgi_set_irqchip_state,
+ .irq_get_irqchip_state = its_sgi_get_irqchip_state,
};
static int its_sgi_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
index fd3be49ac9a5..830d2abf14b3 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
@@ -345,6 +345,15 @@
#define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VGRP1EN (1ULL << 58)
#define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VPEID GENMASK_ULL(15, 0)
+#define GICR_VSGIR 0x0080
+
+#define GICR_VSGIR_VPEID GENMASK(15, 0)
+
+#define GICR_VSGIPENDR 0x0088
+
+#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY (1U << 31)
+#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_PENDING GENMASK(15, 0)
+
/*
* ITS registers, offsets from ITS_base
*/
@@ -368,6 +377,11 @@
#define GITS_TRANSLATER 0x10040
+#define GITS_SGIR 0x20020
+
+#define GITS_SGIR_VPEID GENMASK_ULL(47, 32)
+#define GITS_SGIR_VINTID GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
+
#define GITS_CTLR_ENABLE (1U << 0)
#define GITS_CTLR_ImDe (1U << 1)
#define GITS_CTLR_ITS_NUMBER_SHIFT 4
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 20:33 [PATCH v5 00/23] irqchip/gic-v4: GICv4.1 architecture support Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/23] irqchip/gic-v3: Use SGIs without active state if offered Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 6:30 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12 9:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 12:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-13 1:39 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-12 17:16 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-12 17:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Skip absent CPUs while iterating over redistributors Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:10 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion between vPE affinity change and RD access Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 6:56 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Wait for completion of redistributor's INVALL operation Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 14:23 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion betwen invalidations on the same RD Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 7:11 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 14:23 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 06/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Advertise support v4.1 to KVM Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:10 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 07/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Map the ITS SGIR register page Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:10 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 08/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb skeletal VSGI irqchip Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:10 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 10:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add initial SGI configuration Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 17:53 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-17 2:02 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17 8:36 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb mask/unmask SGI callbacks Marc Zyngier
2020-03-16 18:15 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-03-12 7:41 ` [PATCH v5 11/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state " Zenghui Yu
2020-03-16 21:43 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 10:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 12/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb set_vcpu_affinity " Marc Zyngier
2020-03-17 10:35 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 13/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Move doorbell management to the GICv4 abstraction layer Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 8:20 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 14/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI allocation/teardown Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 8:06 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 15/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI property setup Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 8:09 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17 10:30 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 10:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 16/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Eagerly vmap vPEs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 8:12 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17 2:49 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-19 10:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 2:31 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 17/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Let doorbells be auto-enabled Marc Zyngier
2020-03-12 8:15 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-17 11:04 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 18/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Add direct injection capability to SGI registers Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18 3:28 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 8:11 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 10:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 10:56 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 19/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow SGIs to switch between HW and SW interrupts Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 16:16 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 19:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 20:13 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 9:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 4:22 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 20/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Plumb SGI implementation selection in the distributor Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18 6:34 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-19 12:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 20:38 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 3:08 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 7:59 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 9:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 11:09 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 3:53 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 9:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-23 8:11 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-23 8:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-23 12:40 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 21/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Reload VLPI configuration on distributor enable/disable Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18 3:17 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-19 12:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 22/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow non-trapping WFI when using HW SGIs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 4:23 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 8:12 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 23/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Expose HW-based SGIs in debugfs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18 3:19 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-19 15:05 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 15:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 15:43 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-19 16:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-19 16:17 ` Auger Eric
2020-03-20 4:38 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 9:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 11:35 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-20 11:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 12:09 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-05 3:39 ` [PATCH v5 00/23] irqchip/gic-v4: GICv4.1 architecture support Zenghui Yu
2020-03-09 8:17 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-09 8:46 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200304203330.4967-12-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).