From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Rework timespec functions and usage
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:58:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200318145851.bb3mb7qvga35ambg@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e2efaa3-f2cb-8210-d486-b1250e3be27a@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 02:10:25PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/03/20 18:37, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > The steal_time test's timespec stop condition was wrong and should have
> > used the timespec functions instead to avoid being wrong, but
> > timespec_diff had a strange interface. Rework all the timespec API and
> > its use.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>
> Queued this one,
I don't see this in queue or next.
> I have already pushed the test to kvm/next so the
> "fixup!" commit cannot be squashed. But I don't really mind the code as
> it looks in kvm/next.
The previous patch isn't a huge deal, but it's more than a cleanup,
because if somebody wants to use QUIET when compiling, but then --verbose
when executing, they won't get any verbose output. And the removed,
useless assert is truly useless.
Thanks,
drew
>
> Paolo
>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c | 37 ++++++++-----------
> > .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h | 3 +-
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c | 37 ++++++++-----------
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
> > index d82f7bc060c3..360cd3ea4cd6 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
> > @@ -117,8 +117,7 @@ static void *vcpu_worker(void *data)
> > struct kvm_vm *vm = args->vm;
> > int vcpu_id = args->vcpu_id;
> > struct kvm_run *run;
> > - struct timespec start;
> > - struct timespec end;
> > + struct timespec start, end, ts_diff;
> >
> > vcpu_args_set(vm, vcpu_id, 1, vcpu_id);
> > run = vcpu_state(vm, vcpu_id);
> > @@ -135,9 +134,9 @@ static void *vcpu_worker(void *data)
> > }
> >
> > clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end);
> > - PER_VCPU_DEBUG("vCPU %d execution time: %lld.%.9lds\n", vcpu_id,
> > - (long long)(timespec_diff(start, end).tv_sec),
> > - timespec_diff(start, end).tv_nsec);
> > + ts_diff = timespec_sub(end, start);
> > + PER_VCPU_DEBUG("vCPU %d execution time: %ld.%.9lds\n", vcpu_id,
> > + ts_diff.tv_sec, ts_diff.tv_nsec);
> >
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -201,8 +200,8 @@ static int handle_uffd_page_request(int uffd, uint64_t addr)
> >
> > clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end);
> >
> > - PER_PAGE_DEBUG("UFFDIO_COPY %d \t%lld ns\n", tid,
> > - (long long)timespec_to_ns(timespec_diff(start, end)));
> > + PER_PAGE_DEBUG("UFFDIO_COPY %d \t%ld ns\n", tid,
> > + timespec_to_ns(timespec_sub(end, start)));
> > PER_PAGE_DEBUG("Paged in %ld bytes at 0x%lx from thread %d\n",
> > host_page_size, addr, tid);
> >
> > @@ -224,8 +223,7 @@ static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
> > int pipefd = uffd_args->pipefd;
> > useconds_t delay = uffd_args->delay;
> > int64_t pages = 0;
> > - struct timespec start;
> > - struct timespec end;
> > + struct timespec start, end, ts_diff;
> >
> > clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);
> > while (!quit_uffd_thread) {
> > @@ -295,11 +293,10 @@ static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
> > }
> >
> > clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end);
> > - PER_VCPU_DEBUG("userfaulted %ld pages over %lld.%.9lds. (%f/sec)\n",
> > - pages, (long long)(timespec_diff(start, end).tv_sec),
> > - timespec_diff(start, end).tv_nsec, pages /
> > - ((double)timespec_diff(start, end).tv_sec +
> > - (double)timespec_diff(start, end).tv_nsec / 100000000.0));
> > + ts_diff = timespec_sub(end, start);
> > + PER_VCPU_DEBUG("userfaulted %ld pages over %ld.%.9lds. (%f/sec)\n",
> > + pages, ts_diff.tv_sec, ts_diff.tv_nsec,
> > + pages / ((double)ts_diff.tv_sec + (double)ts_diff.tv_nsec / 100000000.0));
> >
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -360,13 +357,12 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, bool use_uffd,
> > pthread_t *vcpu_threads;
> > pthread_t *uffd_handler_threads = NULL;
> > struct uffd_handler_args *uffd_args = NULL;
> > + struct timespec start, end, ts_diff;
> > int *pipefds = NULL;
> > struct kvm_vm *vm;
> > uint64_t guest_num_pages;
> > int vcpu_id;
> > int r;
> > - struct timespec start;
> > - struct timespec end;
> >
> > vm = create_vm(mode, vcpus, vcpu_memory_bytes);
> >
> > @@ -514,12 +510,11 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, bool use_uffd,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - pr_info("Total guest execution time: %lld.%.9lds\n",
> > - (long long)(timespec_diff(start, end).tv_sec),
> > - timespec_diff(start, end).tv_nsec);
> > + ts_diff = timespec_sub(end, start);
> > + pr_info("Total guest execution time: %ld.%.9lds\n",
> > + ts_diff.tv_sec, ts_diff.tv_nsec);
> > pr_info("Overall demand paging rate: %f pgs/sec\n",
> > - guest_num_pages / ((double)timespec_diff(start, end).tv_sec +
> > - (double)timespec_diff(start, end).tv_nsec / 100000000.0));
> > + guest_num_pages / ((double)ts_diff.tv_sec + (double)ts_diff.tv_nsec / 100000000.0));
> >
> > ucall_uninit(vm);
> > kvm_vm_free(vm);
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
> > index f588ad1403f1..5eb01bf51b86 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
> > @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ void test_assert(bool exp, const char *exp_str,
> > size_t parse_size(const char *size);
> >
> > int64_t timespec_to_ns(struct timespec ts);
> > -struct timespec timespec_diff(struct timespec start, struct timespec end);
> > struct timespec timespec_add_ns(struct timespec ts, int64_t ns);
> > +struct timespec timespec_add(struct timespec ts1, struct timespec ts2);
> > +struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec ts1, struct timespec ts2);
> >
> > #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_TEST_UTIL_H */
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
> > index ee12c4b9ae05..689e97c27ee2 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
> > @@ -56,36 +56,31 @@ int64_t timespec_to_ns(struct timespec ts)
> > return (int64_t)ts.tv_nsec + 1000000000LL * (int64_t)ts.tv_sec;
> > }
> >
> > -struct timespec timespec_diff(struct timespec start, struct timespec end)
> > -{
> > - struct timespec temp;
> > -
> > - if ((end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) < 0) {
> > - temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec - 1;
> > - temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000LL + end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
> > - } else {
> > - temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec;
> > - temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return temp;
> > -}
> > -
> > struct timespec timespec_add_ns(struct timespec ts, int64_t ns)
> > {
> > struct timespec res;
> >
> > - res.tv_sec = ts.tv_sec;
> > res.tv_nsec = ts.tv_nsec + ns;
> > -
> > - if (res.tv_nsec > 1000000000UL) {
> > - res.tv_sec += 1;
> > - res.tv_nsec -= 1000000000UL;
> > - }
> > + res.tv_sec = ts.tv_sec + res.tv_nsec / 1000000000LL;
> > + res.tv_nsec %= 1000000000LL;
> >
> > return res;
> > }
> >
> > +struct timespec timespec_add(struct timespec ts1, struct timespec ts2)
> > +{
> > + int64_t ns1 = timespec_to_ns(ts1);
> > + int64_t ns2 = timespec_to_ns(ts2);
> > + return timespec_add_ns((struct timespec){0}, ns1 + ns2);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec ts1, struct timespec ts2)
> > +{
> > + int64_t ns1 = timespec_to_ns(ts1);
> > + int64_t ns2 = timespec_to_ns(ts2);
> > + return timespec_add_ns((struct timespec){0}, ns1 - ns2);
> > +}
> > +
> > void print_skip(const char *fmt, ...)
> > {
> > va_list ap;
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> > index 21990d653099..86f30eda0ae7 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> > @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static void *do_steal_time(void *arg)
> >
> > while (1) {
> > clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
> > - if (ts.tv_sec > stop.tv_sec || ts.tv_nsec >= stop.tv_nsec)
> > + if (timespec_to_ns(timespec_sub(ts, stop)) >= 0)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-18 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-16 17:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: steal_time cleanups and timespec rework Andrew Jones
2020-03-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fixup! KVM: selftests: Introduce steal-time test Andrew Jones
2020-03-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Rework timespec functions and usage Andrew Jones
2020-03-18 13:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-18 14:58 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200318145851.bb3mb7qvga35ambg@kamzik.brq.redhat.com \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).