From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB68C2BA19 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45DE208E4 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2409987AbgDOPxK (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:53:10 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55124 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404257AbgDOPxH (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:53:07 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F54ACA1; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:53:02 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Mike Stunes Cc: Joerg Roedel , "x86@kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Hellstrom , Jiri Slaby , Dan Williams , Tom Lendacky , Juergen Gross , Kees Cook , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/70] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler Message-ID: <20200415155302.GD21899@suse.de> References: <20200319091407.1481-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20200319091407.1481-41-joro@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Mike, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 07:03:44PM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: > set_memory_decrypted needs to check the return value. I see it > consistently return ENOMEM. I've traced that back to split_large_page > in arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c. I agree that the return code needs to be checked. But I wonder why this happens. The split_large_page() function returns -ENOMEM when alloc_pages() fails. Do you boot the guest with minal RAM assigned? Regards, Joerg