kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86, SVM: do not clobber guest DR6 on KVM_EXIT_DEBUG
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 14:20:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200506212047.GI3329@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506211356.GD228260@xz-x1>

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:13:56PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> Oh... so is dr6 going to have some leftover bit set in the GD test if without
> this patch for AMD?  Btw, I noticed a small difference on Intel/AMD spec for
> this case, e.g., B[0-3] definitions on such leftover bits...
> 
> Intel says:
> 
>         B0 through B3 (breakpoint condition detected) flags (bits 0 through 3)
>         — Indicates (when set) that its associated breakpoint condition was met
>         when a debug exception was generated. These flags are set if the
>         condition described for each breakpoint by the LENn, and R/Wn flags in
>         debug control register DR7 is true. They may or may not be set if the
>         breakpoint is not enabled by the Ln or the Gn flags in register
>         DR7. Therefore on a #DB, a debug handler should check only those B0-B3
>         bits which correspond to an enabled breakpoint.
> 
> AMD says:
> 
>         Breakpoint-Condition Detected (B3–B0)—Bits 3:0. The processor updates
>         these four bits on every debug breakpoint or general-detect
>         condition. A bit is set to 1 if the corresponding address- breakpoint
>         register detects an enabled breakpoint condition, as specified by the
>         DR7 Ln, Gn, R/Wn and LENn controls, and is cleared to 0 otherwise. For
>         example, B1 (bit 1) is set to 1 if an address- breakpoint condition is
>         detected by DR1.
> 
> I'm not sure whether it means AMD B[0-3] bits are more strict on the Intel ones
> (if so, then the selftest could be a bit too strict to VMX).

If the question is "can DR6 bits 3:0 be set on Intel CPUs even if the
associated breakpoint is disabled?", then the answer is yes.  I haven't
looked at the selftest, but if it's checking DR6 then it should ignore
bits corresponding to disabled breakpoints.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-06 11:10 [PATCH 0/9] KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG tests and fixes, DR accessors cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: X86: Declare KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG properly Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: fix DR6 delivery for various cases of #DB injection Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 16:01   ` Peter Xu
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: X86: Set RTM for DB_VECTOR too for KVM_EXIT_DEBUG Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: X86: Fix single-step with KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: selftests: Add KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG test Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: SVM: keep DR6 synchronized with vcpu->arch.dr6 Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 16:04   ` Peter Xu
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86: simplify dr6 accessors in kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 16:06   ` Peter Xu
2020-05-06 16:09     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 17:52       ` Peter Xu
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86, SVM: do not clobber guest DR6 on KVM_EXIT_DEBUG Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 18:15   ` Peter Xu
2020-05-06 20:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 21:13       ` Peter Xu
2020-05-06 21:20         ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-05-06 23:33           ` Peter Xu
2020-05-06 23:47             ` Sean Christopherson
2020-05-06 11:10 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: VMX: pass correct DR6 for GD userspace exit Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 17:50   ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200506212047.GI3329@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).