From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, <cjia@nvidia.com>,
<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <ziye.yang@intel.com>,
<changpeng.liu@intel.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
<mlevitsk@redhat.com>, <eskultet@redhat.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
<dgilbert@redhat.com>, <jonathan.davies@nutanix.com>,
<eauger@redhat.com>, <aik@ozlabs.ru>, <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
<felipe@nutanix.com>, <Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com>,
<shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com>, <Ken.Xue@amd.com>,
<zhi.a.wang@intel.com>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Kernel v22 0/8] Add UAPIs to support migration for VFIO devices
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 10:46:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520104612.03a32977@w520.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97977ede-3c5b-c5a5-7858-7eecd7dd531c@nvidia.com>
On Wed, 20 May 2020 19:10:07 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On 5/20/2020 8:25 AM, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:58:04AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> My impression is that we're getting pretty close to a workable
> >> implementation here with v22 plus respins of patches 5, 6, and 8. We
> >> also have a matching QEMU series and a proposal for a new i40e
> >> consumer, as well as I assume GVT-g updates happening internally at
> >> Intel. I expect all of the latter needs further review and discussion,
> >> but we should be at the point where we can validate these proposed
> >> kernel interfaces. Therefore I'd like to make a call for reviews so
> >> that we can get this wrapped up for the v5.8 merge window. I know
> >> Connie has some outstanding documentation comments and I'd like to make
> >> sure everyone has an opportunity to check that their comments have been
> >> addressed and we don't discover any new blocking issues. Please send
> >> your Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags if you're satisfied with this
> >> interface and implementation. Thanks!
> >>
> > hi Alex and Kirti,
> > after porting to qemu v22 and kernel v22, it is found out that
> > it can not even pass basic live migration test with error like
> >
> > "Failed to get dirty bitmap for iova: 0xca000 size: 0x3000 err: 22"
> >
>
> Thanks for testing Yan.
> I think last moment change in below cause this failure
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/1589871178-8282-1-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com/
>
> > if (dma->iova > iova + size)
> > break;
>
> Surprisingly with my basic testing with 2G sys mem QEMU didn't raise
> abort on g_free, but I do hit this with large sys mem.
> With above change, that function iterated through next vfio_dma as well.
> Check should be as below:
>
> - if (dma->iova > iova + size)
> + if (dma->iova > iova + size -1)
Or just:
if (dma->iova >= iova + size)
Thanks,
Alex
> break;
>
> Another fix is in QEMU.
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg04751.html
>
> > > + range->bitmap.size = ROUND_UP(pages, 64) / 8;
> >
> > ROUND_UP(npages/8, sizeof(u64))?
> >
>
> If npages < 8, npages/8 is 0 and ROUND_UP(0, 8) returns 0.
>
> Changing it as below
>
> - range->bitmap.size = ROUND_UP(pages / 8, sizeof(uint64_t));
> + range->bitmap.size = ROUND_UP(pages, sizeof(__u64) *
> BITS_PER_BYTE) /
> + BITS_PER_BYTE;
>
> I'm updating patches with these fixes and Cornelia's suggestion soon.
>
> Due to short of time I may not be able to address all the concerns
> raised on previous versions of QEMU, I'm trying make QEMU side code
> available for testing for others with latest kernel changes. Don't
> worry, I will revisit comments on QEMU patches. Right now first priority
> is to test kernel UAPI and prepare kernel patches for 5.8
>
> Thanks,
> Kirti
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-18 5:56 [PATCH Kernel v22 0/8] Add UAPIs to support migration for VFIO devices Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 5:56 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 1/8] vfio: UAPI for migration interface for device state Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 5:56 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 2/8] vfio iommu: Remove atomicity of ref_count of pinned pages Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 5:56 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 3/8] vfio iommu: Cache pgsize_bitmap in struct vfio_iommu Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-20 10:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-20 14:46 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 5:56 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 4/8] vfio iommu: Add ioctl definition for dirty pages tracking Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 5:56 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 5/8] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl " Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 21:53 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-19 7:11 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-19 6:52 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 5:56 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 6/8] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-19 6:54 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-20 10:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-20 15:16 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 5:56 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 7/8] vfio iommu: Add migration capability to report supported features Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-20 10:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-20 15:23 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-18 5:56 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 8/8] vfio: Selective dirty page tracking if IOMMU backed device pins pages Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-19 6:54 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-19 16:58 ` [PATCH Kernel v22 0/8] Add UAPIs to support migration for VFIO devices Alex Williamson
2020-05-20 2:55 ` Yan Zhao
2020-05-20 13:40 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-20 16:46 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2020-05-21 5:08 ` Yan Zhao
2020-05-21 7:09 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-21 7:04 ` Yan Zhao
2020-05-21 7:28 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-21 7:32 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-25 6:59 ` Yan Zhao
2020-05-25 13:20 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-26 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-27 6:23 ` Yan Zhao
2020-05-27 8:48 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-05-28 8:01 ` Yan Zhao
2020-05-28 22:53 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-29 11:12 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-05-28 22:59 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-29 4:15 ` Yan Zhao
2020-05-29 17:57 ` Kirti Wankhede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200520104612.03a32977@w520.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=Ken.Xue@amd.com \
--cc=Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=eskultet@redhat.com \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@nutanix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
--cc=ziye.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).