kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio-ccw: document possible errors
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 08:19:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527081934.2dceda89.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed9b7c9b-3dc7-e573-55a8-d52f28877da9@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, 26 May 2020 15:39:22 -0400
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 5/8/20 6:55 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:33:18 -0400
> > Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 4/7/20 7:16 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:  
> >>> Interacting with the I/O and the async regions can yield a number
> >>> of errors, which had been undocumented so far. These are part of
> >>> the api, so remedy that.    
> >>
> >> (Makes a note to myself, to do the same for the schib/crw regions we're
> >> adding for channel path handling.)  
> > 
> > Yes, please :) I plan to merge this today, so you can add a patch on
> > top.  
> 
> I finally picked this up and realized that the io and async regions both
> document the return codes that would be stored in a field within their
> respective regions. The schib/crw regions don't have any such field, so
> the only values to be documented are the ones that the .read callback
> itself returns. What obvious thing am I missing?

The fact that you are right :)

No need to do anything, I might have spread my own confusion here ;)


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-27  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-07 11:16 [PATCH] vfio-ccw: document possible errors Cornelia Huck
2020-04-17 16:33 ` Eric Farman
2020-05-08 10:55   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-26 19:39     ` Eric Farman
2020-05-27  6:19       ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-05-27 10:44         ` Eric Farman
2020-05-08 10:59 ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200527081934.2dceda89.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).