From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EE6C433E0 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A27D206E6 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726077AbgFCPS7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:18:59 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:45988 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725985AbgFCPS7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:18:59 -0400 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B99F28B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:18:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:18:57 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Brian Gerst Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Hellstrom , Jiri Slaby , Dan Williams , Tom Lendacky , Juergen Gross , Kees Cook , David Rientjes , Cfir Cohen , Erdem Aktas , Masami Hiramatsu , Mike Stunes , Joerg Roedel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kvm list , Linux Virtualization Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 35/75] x86/head/64: Build k/head64.c with -fno-stack-protector Message-ID: <20200603151857.GC23071@8bytes.org> References: <20200428151725.31091-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20200428151725.31091-36-joro@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:58:18AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:28 AM Joerg Roedel wrote: > The proper fix would be to initialize MSR_GS_BASE earlier. That'll mean to initialize it two times during boot, as the first C function with stack-protection is called before the kernel switches to its high addresses (early_idt_setup call-path). But okay, I can do that. On the other side, which value does the stack protector have in the early boot code? Joerg