From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: Support guest MAXPHYADDR < host MAXPHYADDR
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:26:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710172628.GH1749@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e784c62-15ee-63b7-4942-474493bac536@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:16:14PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/07/20 19:13, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:06 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/07/20 18:30, Jim Mattson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> This can be problem when having a mixed setup of machines with 5-level page
> >>>> tables and machines with 4-level page tables, as live migration can change
> >>>> MAXPHYADDR while the guest runs, which can theoretically introduce bugs.
> >>>
> >>> Huh? Changing MAXPHYADDR while the guest runs should be illegal. Or
> >>> have I missed some peculiarity of LA57 that makes MAXPHYADDR a dynamic
> >>> CPUID information field?
> >>
> >> Changing _host_ MAXPHYADDR while the guest runs, such as if you migrate
> >> from a host-maxphyaddr==46 to a host-maxphyaddr==52 machine (while
> >> keeping guest-maxphyaddr==46).
> >
> > Ah, but what does that have to do with LA57?
>
> Intel only has MAXPHYADDR > 46 on LA57 machines (because in general OSes
> like to have a physical 1:1 map into the kernel part of the virtual
> address space, so having a higher MAXPHYADDR would be of limited use
> with 48-bit linear addresses).
>
> In other words, while this issue has existed forever it could be ignored
> until IceLake introduced MAXPHYADDR==52 machines. I'll introduce
> something like this in a commit message.
Yeah, the whole 5-level vs. 4-level thing needs clarification. Using 5-level
doesn't magically change the host's MAXPA. But using 5-level vs. 4-level EPT
does change the guest's effective MAXPA.
If the changelog is referring purely to host MAXPA, then just explicitly
state that and don't even mention 5-level vs. 4-level.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-10 15:48 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: Support guest MAXPHYADDR < host MAXPHYADDR Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: x86: Add helper functions for illegal GPA checking and page fault injection Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: x86: mmu: Move translate_gpa() to mmu.c Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: x86: mmu: Add guest physical address check in translate_gpa() Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: x86: rename update_bp_intercept to update_exception_bitmap Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 16:15 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: x86: update exception bitmap on CPUID changes Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 16:25 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KVM: VMX: introduce vmx_need_pf_intercept Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: VMX: Add guest physical address check in EPT violation and misconfig Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-13 18:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-15 23:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-08-17 17:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-08-17 18:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-09 16:17 ` Jim Mattson
2020-10-14 23:44 ` Jim Mattson
2020-10-23 3:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-23 9:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-23 16:59 ` Jim Mattson
2020-10-23 17:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-23 17:23 ` Jim Mattson
2020-10-23 17:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-15 19:35 ` Jim Mattson
2021-01-20 21:16 ` Jim Mattson
2021-01-27 20:57 ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-21 18:31 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: VMX: optimize #PF injection when MAXPHYADDR does not match Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: x86: SVM: VMX: Make GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR support configurable Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 17:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 16:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: Support guest MAXPHYADDR < host MAXPHYADDR Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 17:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 17:13 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 17:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 17:26 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-07-10 17:26 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 17:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 17:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200710172628.GH1749@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgamal@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).