From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B93C433DF for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4909221D95 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:59:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596650380; bh=auCGx6XCpPj3YqEfR6NXLz5q29tOXX3dB0MRke0HUQQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=omJN2q4VKFnT4MJCavv3x9Ih4ZsZ9I34tB5NX2uoivGIJQ8eqcj1F0XJTiGxSaS/6 dYe8HMKwy1lBlD9aSs/zlXKgei2ORjuSx5x/LfKg7YW36bgyq6/uotVXQoL4hO9WaP 5GBC3yf6f1avFZDT95p6AVVe0p7ixLrA+PA4eZ2Q= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728774AbgHER6t (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:58:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45308 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729072AbgHER5o (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:57:44 -0400 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01FEB2250E; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:57:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596650235; bh=auCGx6XCpPj3YqEfR6NXLz5q29tOXX3dB0MRke0HUQQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Dq0mTS5ldx9HxUmrCnD0/17fGX0zXjqZ6in/6TXrm92Pc61ToxKYi1AR+F+gYHNTQ n6YBKphf2pcDLWZK+nIM00efMICQMG1YOV26GFBe54ICAMPhw9vRlmi7OFhmAUE4H8 hV7YhEKHnG4vhcQ2XZsG/wLq4PhPK4OPOPCq2q+4= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3Nf7-0004w9-IK; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:57:13 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Alexander Graf , Alexandru Elisei , Andrew Scull , Catalin Marinas , Christoffer Dall , David Brazdil , Eric Auger , Gavin Shan , James Morse , Mark Rutland , Peng Hao , Quentin Perret , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH 02/56] KVM: arm64: Allow ARM64_PTR_AUTH when ARM64_VHE=n Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:56:06 +0100 Message-Id: <20200805175700.62775-3-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200805175700.62775-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20200805175700.62775-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: pbonzini@redhat.com, graf@amazon.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, ascull@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, gshan@redhat.com, james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, richard.peng@oppo.com, qperret@google.com, will@kernel.org, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org We currently prevent PtrAuth from even being built if KVM is selected, but VHE isn't. It is a bit of a pointless restriction, since we also check this at run time (rejecting the enabling of PtrAuth for the vcpu if we're not running with VHE). Just drop this apparently useless restriction. Acked-by: Andrew Scull Acked-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 31380da53689..d719ea9c596d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -1516,7 +1516,6 @@ menu "ARMv8.3 architectural features" config ARM64_PTR_AUTH bool "Enable support for pointer authentication" default y - depends on !KVM || ARM64_VHE depends on (CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS || CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET) && AS_HAS_PAC # GCC 9.1 and later inserts a .note.gnu.property section note for PAC # which is only understood by binutils starting with version 2.33.1. @@ -1543,8 +1542,7 @@ config ARM64_PTR_AUTH The feature is detected at runtime. If the feature is not present in hardware it will not be advertised to userspace/KVM guest nor will it - be enabled. However, KVM guest also require VHE mode and hence - CONFIG_ARM64_VHE=y option to use this feature. + be enabled. If the feature is present on the boot CPU but not on a late CPU, then the late CPU will be parked. Also, if the boot CPU does not have -- 2.27.0