From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D54C433E6 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBAB20665 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="IAJ0KU/y" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728604AbgH1IK3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:10:29 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:60238 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727971AbgH1IKW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:10:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1598602221; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xvafGB3h1uSuShOcxklJX4Q2Ef6CI/lwjYNIZ0zdVjc=; b=IAJ0KU/y5M3VFQYb7/2GeCjUEQEkMijjGGhKGvBRTD7dtRO/0Eb30o7/ebdIk5/tWm3JYc u9T8IJasvDzws8iDwRYVss7soKgmWRKyXwNDR+WwJ6UHM5YCkOj4Fx1MzgmrXKwLXEHSXi zb2I7PpQp4HK/CfHlsUrrI6abjvzUSs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-498-RHOgIQ7tOa6GJlcVJUT-kg-1; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:10:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: RHOgIQ7tOa6GJlcVJUT-kg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204F5425E8; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-113-255.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.255]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2C85D9F3; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:10:02 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Tony Krowiak Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/16] s390/vfio-ap: add version vfio_ap module Message-ID: <20200828101002.57c0d81f.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <8b3eb14e-c388-3025-1bfb-2dc7fb820de3@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200821195616.13554-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20200821195616.13554-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20200825120432.13a1b444.cohuck@redhat.com> <20200827123240.42e0c787.cohuck@redhat.com> <8b3eb14e-c388-3025-1bfb-2dc7fb820de3@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:39:07 -0400 Tony Krowiak wrote: > Currently there are two tools that probably need to be aware of > the changes to these assignment interfaces: > * The hades test framework has tests that will fail if run against > =C2=A0=C2=A0 these patches that should be skipped if over-provisioning is > =C2=A0=C2=A0 allowed. There are also tests under development to test the > =C2=A0=C2=A0 function introduced by these patches that will fail if run = against > =C2=A0=C2=A0 an older version of the driver. These tests should be skipp= ed in > =C2=A0=C2=A0 that case. > * There is a tool under development for configuring AP matrix > =C2=A0=C2=A0 mediated devices that probably need to be aware of the chan= ge > =C2=A0=C2=A0 introduced by this series. >=20 > Since a tool would have to first determine whether a new sysfs > interface documenting facilities is available and it would only > expose one facility at this point, it seems reasonable for these tools > to check for the sysfs guest_matrix attribute to discern whether > over-provisioning is available or not. I'll go ahead and remove this > patch from the series. Thanks for the explanation, that seems reasonable to me.