From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: eric.auger@redhat.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, joro@8bytes.org,
kevin.tian@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
ashok.raj@intel.com, jun.j.tian@intel.com, yi.y.sun@intel.com,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
hao.wu@intel.com, stefanha@gmail.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/16] vfio/type1: Add VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST (alloc/free)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:38:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911153806.6dda06b9@w520.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1599734733-6431-8-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:45:24 -0700
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> This patch allows userspace to request PASID allocation/free, e.g. when
> serving the request from the guest.
>
> PASIDs that are not freed by userspace are automatically freed when the
> IOASID set is destroyed when process exits.
>
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v6 -> v7:
> *) current VFIO returns allocated pasid via signed int, thus VFIO UAPI
> can only support 31 bits pasid. If user space gives min,max which is
> wider than 31 bits, should fail the allocation or free request.
>
> v5 -> v6:
> *) address comments from Eric against v5. remove the alloc/free helper.
>
> v4 -> v5:
> *) address comments from Eric Auger.
> *) the comments for the PASID_FREE request is addressed in patch 5/15 of
> this series.
>
> v3 -> v4:
> *) address comments from v3, except the below comment against the range
> of PASID_FREE request. needs more help on it.
> "> +if (req.range.min > req.range.max)
>
> Is it exploitable that a user can spin the kernel for a long time in
> the case of a free by calling this with [0, MAX_UINT] regardless of
> their actual allocations?"
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200702151832.048b44d1@x1.home/
>
> v1 -> v2:
> *) move the vfio_mm related code to be a seprate module
> *) use a single structure for alloc/free, could support a range of PASIDs
> *) fetch vfio_mm at group_attach time instead of at iommu driver open time
> ---
> drivers/vfio/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c | 10 ++++++
> include/linux/vfio.h | 6 ++++
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> index 3d8a108..95d90c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> config VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1
> tristate
> depends on VFIO
> + select VFIO_PASID if (X86)
> default n
>
> config VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 3c0048b..bd4b668 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
> bool dirty_page_tracking;
> bool pinned_page_dirty_scope;
> struct iommu_nesting_info *nesting_info;
> + struct vfio_mm *vmm;
> };
>
> struct vfio_domain {
> @@ -2000,6 +2001,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_iova_insert_copy(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>
> static void vfio_iommu_release_nesting_info(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> {
> + if (iommu->vmm) {
> + vfio_mm_put(iommu->vmm);
> + iommu->vmm = NULL;
> + }
> +
> kfree(iommu->nesting_info);
> iommu->nesting_info = NULL;
> }
> @@ -2127,6 +2133,26 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> iommu->nesting_info);
> if (ret)
> goto out_detach;
> +
> + if (iommu->nesting_info->features &
> + IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_SYSWIDE_PASID) {
> + struct vfio_mm *vmm;
> + struct ioasid_set *set;
> +
> + vmm = vfio_mm_get_from_task(current);
> + if (IS_ERR(vmm)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(vmm);
> + goto out_detach;
> + }
> + iommu->vmm = vmm;
> +
> + set = vfio_mm_ioasid_set(vmm);
> + ret = iommu_domain_set_attr(domain->domain,
> + DOMAIN_ATTR_IOASID_SET,
> + set);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_detach;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Get aperture info */
> @@ -2908,6 +2934,54 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request req;
> + unsigned long minsz;
> + int ret;
> +
> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request, range);
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&req, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (req.argsz < minsz || (req.flags & ~VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Current VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST only supports at most
> + * 31 bits PASID. The min,max value from userspace should
> + * not exceed 31 bits.
Please describe the source of this restriction. I think it's due to
using the ioctl return value to return the PASID, thus excluding the
negative values, but aren't we actually restricted to pasid_bits
exposed in the nesting_info? If this is just a sanity test for the API
then why are we defining VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_BITS in the uapi header,
which causes conflicting information to the user... which do they
honor? Should we instead verify that pasid_bits matches our API scheme
when configuring the nested domain and then let the ioasid allocator
reject requests outside of the range?
> + */
> + if (req.range.min > req.range.max ||
> + req.range.min > (1 << VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_BITS) ||
> + req.range.max > (1 << VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_BITS))
Off by one, >= for the bit test.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> + if (!iommu->vmm) {
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + switch (req.flags & VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK) {
> + case VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID:
> + ret = vfio_pasid_alloc(iommu->vmm, req.range.min,
> + req.range.max);
> + break;
> + case VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID:
> + vfio_pasid_free_range(iommu->vmm, req.range.min,
> + req.range.max);
> + ret = 0;
Set the initial value when it's declared?
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> {
> @@ -2924,6 +2998,8 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> return vfio_iommu_type1_unmap_dma(iommu, arg);
> case VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES:
> return vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(iommu, arg);
> + case VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST:
> + return vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(iommu, arg);
> default:
> return -ENOTTY;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> index 44ecdd5..0ec4660 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> {
> kref_put_mutex(&vmm->kref, vfio_mm_release, &vfio_mm_lock);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_put);
>
> static void vfio_mm_get(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> {
> @@ -113,6 +114,13 @@ struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm_get_from_task(struct task_struct *task)
> mmput(mm);
> return vmm;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_get_from_task);
> +
> +struct ioasid_set *vfio_mm_ioasid_set(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> +{
> + return vmm->ioasid_set;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_ioasid_set);
>
> /*
> * Find PASID within @min and @max
> @@ -201,6 +209,7 @@ int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max)
>
> return pasid;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pasid_alloc);
>
> void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
> ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
> @@ -217,6 +226,7 @@ void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
> vfio_remove_pasid(vmm, vid);
> mutex_unlock(&vmm->pasid_lock);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pasid_free_range);
>
> static int __init vfio_pasid_init(void)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index 31472a9..5c3d7a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct vfio_mm;
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PASID)
> extern struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm_get_from_task(struct task_struct *task);
> extern void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm);
> +extern struct ioasid_set *vfio_mm_ioasid_set(struct vfio_mm *vmm);
> extern int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max);
> extern void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
> ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max);
> @@ -114,6 +115,11 @@ static inline void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> {
> }
>
> +static inline struct ioasid_set *vfio_mm_ioasid_set(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> +{
> + return -ENOTTY;
> +}
> +
> static inline int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max)
> {
> return -ENOTTY;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index ff40f9e..a4bc42e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1172,6 +1172,49 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap_get {
>
> #define VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17)
>
> +/**
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18,
> + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request)
> + *
> + * PASID (Processor Address Space ID) is a PCIe concept for tagging
> + * address spaces in DMA requests. When system-wide PASID allocation
> + * is required by the underlying iommu driver (e.g. Intel VT-d), this
> + * provides an interface for userspace to request pasid alloc/free
> + * for its assigned devices. Userspace should check the availability
> + * of this API by checking VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING through
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO.
> + *
> + * @flags=VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID, allocate a single PASID within @range.
> + * @flags=VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID, free the PASIDs within @range.
> + * @range is [min, max], which means both @min and @max are inclusive.
> + * ALLOC_PASID and FREE_PASID are mutually exclusive.
> + *
> + * Current interface supports at most 31 bits PASID bits as returning
> + * PASID allocation result via signed int. PCIe spec defines 20 bits
> + * for PASID width, so 31 bits is enough. As a result user space should
> + * provide min, max no more than 31 bits.
Perhaps this is the description I was looking for, but this still
conflicts with what I think the user is supposed to do, which is to
provide a range within nesting_info.pasid_bits. These seem like
implementation details, not uapi. Thanks,
Alex
> + * returns: allocated PASID value on success, -errno on failure for
> + * ALLOC_PASID;
> + * 0 for FREE_PASID operation;
> + */
> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request {
> + __u32 argsz;
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID (1 << 0)
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID (1 << 1)
> + __u32 flags;
> + struct {
> + __u32 min;
> + __u32 max;
> + } range;
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK (VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID | \
> + VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID)
> +
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_BITS 31
> +
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18)
> +
> /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 10:45 [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 01/16] iommu: Report domain nesting info Liu Yi L
2020-09-11 19:38 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 02/16] iommu/smmu: Report empty " Liu Yi L
2021-01-12 6:50 ` Vivek Gautam
2021-01-12 9:21 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-01-12 11:05 ` Vivek Gautam
2021-01-13 5:56 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-01-19 10:03 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-23 8:59 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-02-12 7:14 ` Vivek Gautam
2021-02-12 9:57 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-12 10:18 ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-02-12 11:01 ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-03-03 9:44 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 03/16] vfio/type1: Report iommu nesting info to userspace Liu Yi L
2020-09-11 20:16 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-12 8:24 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 04/16] vfio: Add PASID allocation/free support Liu Yi L
2020-09-11 20:54 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-15 4:03 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 05/16] iommu/vt-d: Support setting ioasid set to domain Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 06/16] iommu/vt-d: Remove get_task_mm() in bind_gpasid() Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 07/16] vfio/type1: Add VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST (alloc/free) Liu Yi L
2020-09-11 21:38 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 08/16] iommu: Pass domain to sva_unbind_gpasid() Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 09/16] iommu/vt-d: Check ownership for PASIDs from user-space Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 10/16] vfio/type1: Support binding guest page tables to PASID Liu Yi L
2020-09-11 22:03 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-12 6:02 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 11/16] vfio/type1: Allow invalidating first-level/stage IOMMU cache Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 12/16] vfio/type1: Add vSVA support for IOMMU-backed mdevs Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 13/16] vfio/pci: Expose PCIe PASID capability to guest Liu Yi L
2020-09-11 22:13 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-12 7:17 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 14/16] vfio: Document dual stage control Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 15/16] iommu/vt-d: Only support nesting when nesting caps are consistent across iommu units Liu Yi L
2020-09-10 10:45 ` [PATCH v7 16/16] iommu/vt-d: Support reporting nesting capability info Liu Yi L
2020-09-14 4:20 ` [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs Jason Wang
2020-09-14 8:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-09-14 8:57 ` Jason Wang
2020-09-14 10:38 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-09-14 11:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 13:31 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-14 13:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 16:22 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-09-14 16:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 16:58 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-14 17:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 18:23 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-14 19:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 22:33 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-15 14:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 1:19 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-09-16 8:32 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-16 14:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 16:20 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-16 16:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 16:50 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-16 14:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-17 6:01 ` Tian, Kevin
[not found] ` <20200914224438.GA65940@otc-nc-03>
2020-09-15 11:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-15 18:11 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-09-15 18:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-15 19:26 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-09-15 23:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 2:33 ` Jason Wang
2020-09-15 22:08 ` Jacob Pan
2020-09-15 23:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20200915171319.00003f59@linux.intel.com>
2020-09-16 1:46 ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-16 15:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 16:33 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-09-16 17:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 18:21 ` Jacob Pan (Jun)
2020-09-16 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 23:09 ` Jacob Pan (Jun)
2020-09-17 3:53 ` Jason Wang
2020-09-17 17:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-17 18:17 ` Jacob Pan (Jun)
2020-09-18 3:58 ` Jason Wang
2020-09-16 2:29 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200911153806.6dda06b9@w520.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jun.j.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).