From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Refactor filtering of ID registers
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:56:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114105633.2558739-5-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114105633.2558739-1-maz@kernel.org>
Our current ID register filtering is starting to be a mess of if()
statements, and isn't going to get any saner.
Let's turn it into a switch(), which has a chance of being more
readable, and introduce a FEATURE() macro that allows easy generation
of feature masks.
No functionnal change intended.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 2bea0494b81d..dda16d60197b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
* Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com>
*/
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/bsearch.h>
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -1016,6 +1017,8 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return true;
}
+#define FEATURE(x) (GENMASK_ULL(x##_SHIFT + 3, x##_SHIFT))
+
/* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
@@ -1024,36 +1027,38 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
(u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
u64 val = raz ? 0 : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
- if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1) {
+ switch (id) {
+ case SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1:
if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
- val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT);
- val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT);
- val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
- val |= ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
- val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT);
- val |= ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3 << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT);
- } else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1) {
- val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
- } else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 && !vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
- val &= ~((0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT) |
- (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_API_SHIFT) |
- (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA_SHIFT) |
- (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI_SHIFT));
- } else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) {
- u64 cap = 0;
-
+ val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_SVE);
+ val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_AMU);
+ val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2);
+ val |= FIELD_PREP(FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2), (u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2);
+ val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3);
+ val |= FIELD_PREP(FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3), (u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3);
+ break;
+ case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1:
+ val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
+ break;
+ case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1:
+ if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
+ val &= ~(FEATURE(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) |
+ FEATURE(ID_AA64ISAR1_API) |
+ FEATURE(ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA) |
+ FEATURE(ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI));
+ break;
+ case SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1:
/* Limit guests to PMUv3 for ARMv8.1 */
- if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))
- cap = ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_1;
-
val = cpuid_feature_cap_perfmon_field(val,
- ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT,
- cap);
- } else if (id == SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) {
+ ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT,
+ kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) ? ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_1 : 0);
+ break;
+ case SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1:
/* Limit guests to PMUv3 for ARMv8.1 */
val = cpuid_feature_cap_perfmon_field(val,
ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT,
kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) ? ID_DFR0_PERFMON_8_1 : 0);
+ break;
}
return val;
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-14 10:56 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: arm64: More PMU/debug ID register fixes Marc Zyngier
2021-01-14 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: arm64: Fix missing RES1 in emulation of DBGBIDR Marc Zyngier
2021-01-15 13:05 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-14 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Fix AArch32 PMUv3 capping Marc Zyngier
2021-01-15 13:05 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-14 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: arm64: Add handling of AArch32 PCMEID{2,3} PMUv3 registers Marc Zyngier
2021-01-15 13:04 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-14 10:56 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-01-15 13:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Refactor filtering of ID registers Auger Eric
2021-01-14 10:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: arm64: Limit the debug architecture to ARMv8.0 Marc Zyngier
2021-01-15 14:01 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-14 10:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: arm64: Upgrade PMU support to ARMv8.4 Marc Zyngier
2021-01-15 14:01 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-15 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-15 17:26 ` Auger Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210114105633.2558739-5-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).