[kvm-unit-tests PATCH] lib/s390x/sclp: Clarify that the CPUEntry array could be at a different spot

[Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>]

The "struct CPUEntry entries[0]" in the ReadInfo structure is misleading
since the entries could be add a completely different spot. Replace it
by a proper comment instead.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 lib/s390x/sclp.h | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
index 9f81c0f..8523133 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -131,10 +131,15 @@ typedef struct ReadInfo {
 	uint16_t highest_cpu;
 	uint8_t  _reserved5[124 - 122];     /* 122-123 */
 	uint32_t hmfai;
-	uint8_t reserved7[134 - 128];
+	uint8_t reserved7[134 - 128];       /* 128-133 */
 	uint8_t byte_134_diag318 : 1;
 	uint8_t : 7;
-	struct CPUEntry entries[0];
+	/*
+	 * At the end of the ReadInfo, there are also the CPU entries (see
+	 * struct CPUEntry). When the Extended-Length SCCB (ELS) feature is
+	 * enabled, the start of the CPU entries array begins at an offset
+	 * denoted by the offset_cpu field, otherwise it's at offset 128.
+	 */
 } __attribute__((packed)) ReadInfo;
 
 typedef struct ReadCpuInfo {
-- 
2.27.0