[PATCH v5 03/16] perf/x86/core: Pass "struct kvm_pmu *" to determine the guest values

From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
	wei.w.wang@intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	liuxiangdong5@huawei.com, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/16] perf/x86/core: Pass "struct kvm_pmu *" to determine the guest values
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:20:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210415032016.166201-4-like.xu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415032016.166201-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>

Splitting the logic for determining the guest values is unnecessarily
confusing, and potentially fragile. Perf should have full knowledge and
control of what values are loaded for the guest.

If we change .guest_get_msrs() to take a struct kvm_pmu pointer, then it
can generate the full set of guest values by grabbing guest ds_area and
pebs_data_cfg. Alternatively, .guest_get_msrs() could take the desired
guest MSR values directly (ds_area and pebs_data_cfg), but kvm_pmu is
vendor agnostic, so we don't see any reason to not just pass the pointer.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c            | 4 ++--
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c      | 4 ++--
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h      | 2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++--
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c            | 3 ++-
 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 06bef6ba8a9b..7e2264a8c3f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -673,9 +673,9 @@ void x86_pmu_disable_all(void)
 	}
 }
 
-struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
+struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data)
 {
-	return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
+	return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr, data);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 021658df1feb..2f8ac53fe594 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3834,7 +3834,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
+static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *arr = cpuc->guest_switch_msrs;
@@ -3866,7 +3866,7 @@ static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
 	return arr;
 }
 
-static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *core_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
+static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *core_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *arr = cpuc->guest_switch_msrs;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 85dc4e1d4514..e52b35333e1f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	/*
 	 * Intel host/guest support (KVM)
 	 */
-	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *(*guest_get_msrs)(int *nr);
+	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *(*guest_get_msrs)(int *nr, void *data);
 
 	/*
 	 * Check period value for PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD ioctl.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 6a6e707905be..d5957b68906b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -491,10 +491,10 @@ static inline void perf_check_microcode(void) { }
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)
-extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
+extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
 extern int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr);
 #else
-struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
+struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
 static inline int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
 {
 	return -1;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index c05e6e2854b5..58673351c475 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -6537,9 +6537,10 @@ static void atomic_switch_perf_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 {
 	int i, nr_msrs;
 	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *msrs;
+	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(&vmx->vcpu);
 
 	/* Note, nr_msrs may be garbage if perf_guest_get_msrs() returns NULL. */
-	msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs(&nr_msrs);
+	msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs(&nr_msrs, (void *)pmu);
 	if (!msrs)
 		return;
 
-- 
2.30.2

