From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFF6C433B4 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 12:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F49B61456 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 12:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236852AbhEGMly (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 08:41:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60720 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231363AbhEGMlx (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 08:41:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5552EC061574; Fri, 7 May 2021 05:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id a5so484875pfa.11; Fri, 07 May 2021 05:40:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=K0GDzDwQRyBfODABKyw5LLI9ujmEOh6+qR+zb02Vkbw=; b=Z0NORb9zPpAnBIhoiVQcJ/JPUDLXhBlNo4Lc/ml2QdvtGXszL+j5clrN40ofix0rrt OhA9CAnuwzJJHr5VMn8u4pOhnLTve3ssdslJSMZ/y0iuVY6wKxotaeq3eZWw+SPeJbiA uQzK4n90YodGutnlO6oV0x/Q7SzusfBcjOihQEyVZWQ2umJTNtK3xpbRE7AMR8fiZHEE xGH1FVXnpQbguiucjfzTX/GNMY3A0Ir8rfsfFYrSPDBub71db9LenlW4BwLlQ35KsRiy pI74NwHqGTkvn5+ogLlnIgd4DvcbbB0L7kGoCCjCPOVaia6xDsh9pQ6brkIRSdzhwXYz KkHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=K0GDzDwQRyBfODABKyw5LLI9ujmEOh6+qR+zb02Vkbw=; b=YZA5VxJwNcqsMF8ptrUCnQJUjjSkRQ11FlHLdfI9AAMkxxXwkgvfNPsDrdV8ZXnWcT 4kt87ynqxtwwF44XCs439ox/xC9kylWTthQgK6WC2n+c+2uGsnMVd96HbjBSCEpihi2O +NT+3xsefPK3+gImw4W/sGXOlE0UlF1Nn0129Whh++zNyUf1Okq7Fk+UaCTDmvU4NQfB oI5NAFitPHruzNwJHBYn3OWkXgehWiqDZ0qxTK2xRiRBK11tZxBCvh1aGmLZAwnodQAI 2M5zTGug6kZlr6s/hzpmwc7UH5jBRrmVpNGh1vzrLGzyhVrI2/9siyg0oonEmLSkyQpC Jufw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336ZmnBR+ca2SoPYUmQhBTENSi7Fme5igs+BY1+Opq4u1S3UJr4 6FlQbdbS06pbkHU+CPr2alI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/SealIvabP7ffELGzmScDoaFvJraiTa5lh8vtwVwLejQeozppMlBQGlGe2Jbw3EoFvegReg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5b1a:: with SMTP id p26mr9748867pgb.65.1620391253811; Fri, 07 May 2021 05:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([203.87.99.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f14sm4658373pjq.50.2021.05.07.05.40.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 May 2021 05:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 22:40:49 +1000 From: Balbir Singh To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] delayacct: Use sched_clock() Message-ID: <20210507124049.GC4236@balbir-desktop> References: <20210505105940.190490250@infradead.org> <20210505111525.001031466@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210505111525.001031466@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:59:41PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Like all scheduler statistics, use sched_clock() based time. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > --- Goind by your comment about preemption safety not being a concern the patch looks good. Acked-by: Balbir Singh