From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v5 1/3] vfio-ccw: Check initialized flag in cp_init()
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 22:56:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210510205646.1845844-2-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210510205646.1845844-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>
We have a really nice flag in the channel_program struct that
indicates if it had been initialized by cp_init(), and use it
as a guard in the other cp accessor routines, but not for a
duplicate call into cp_init(). The possibility of this occurring
is low, because that flow is protected by the private->io_mutex
and FSM CP_PROCESSING state. But then why bother checking it
in (for example) cp_prefetch() then?
Let's just be consistent and check for that in cp_init() too.
Fixes: 71189f263f8a3 ("vfio-ccw: make it safe to access channel programs")
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
index b9febc581b1f..8d1b2771c1aa 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
@@ -638,6 +638,10 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 1);
int ret;
+ /* this is an error in the caller */
+ if (cp->initialized)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
/*
* We only support prefetching the channel program. We assume all channel
* programs executed by supported guests likewise support prefetching.
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-10 20:56 [RFC PATCH v5 0/3] vfio-ccw: Fix interrupt handling for HALT/CLEAR Eric Farman
2021-05-10 20:56 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2021-05-10 20:56 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/3] vfio-ccw: Reset FSM state to IDLE inside FSM Eric Farman
2021-05-10 20:56 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/3] vfio-ccw: Serialize FSM IDLE state with I/O completion Eric Farman
2021-05-11 11:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-05-11 18:02 ` Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210510205646.1845844-2-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).