From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2474C43461 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8646186A for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229921AbhEKQXj (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 12:23:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:48912 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231454AbhEKQXh (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 12:23:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620750150; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gNm7B4TSVI5MowxGlD80Vrp67V76f4nfgzEtOQtowGQ=; b=BdTEYrVco9cQ/jWeN65dQ4M4ror3hqDC9VNJL5LtQ3WMX4c0TzkcFTxxsLw50flEKGhbuS Rf1fDROVxoIinC5hjR4klNp6q6UOxAmG5w3oZFiPrmLgsR5yfwXfm7a03yWWVwJzW+LWuB psUBi6Dh4e52K61f/h1TlnOP790fgCk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-456-0-BDVpg0Pa6_jc1xy1hbkQ-1; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:22:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0-BDVpg0Pa6_jc1xy1hbkQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8BD8014D8; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin.fritz.box (ovpn-113-172.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.172]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17762B162; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:22:14 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Janosch Frank Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/6] s390x: uv-guest: Test invalid commands Message-ID: <20210511182214.232e3763.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210510135148.1904-6-frankja@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210510135148.1904-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> <20210510135148.1904-6-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 May 2021 13:51:47 +0000 Janosch Frank wrote: > Let's check if the UV calls that should not be available in a > protected guest 2 are actually not available. Also let's check if they > are falsely indicated to be available. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > --- > s390x/uv-guest.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) I cannot double check, but these are all commands I'd not expect to be available. Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck