kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>,
	Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<oxffffaa@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 03/18] af_vsock: separate receive data loop
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:10:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210611111024.3651284-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210611110744.3650456-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>

Some code in receive data loop could be shared between SEQPACKET
and STREAM sockets, while another part is type specific, so move STREAM
specific data receive logic to '__vsock_stream_recvmsg()' dedicated
function, while checks, that will be same for both STREAM and SEQPACKET
sockets, stays in 'vsock_connectible_recvmsg()'.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 4269e80b02cd..c4f6bfa1e381 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1896,65 +1896,22 @@ static int vsock_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct wait_queue_entry *wait,
 	return data;
 }
 
-static int
-vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
-			  int flags)
+static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
+				  size_t len, int flags)
 {
-	struct sock *sk;
-	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data recv_data;
 	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
-	int err;
-	size_t target;
+	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
 	ssize_t copied;
+	size_t target;
 	long timeout;
-	struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data recv_data;
+	int err;
 
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 
-	sk = sock->sk;
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
-	err = 0;
-
-	lock_sock(sk);
-
 	transport = vsk->transport;
 
-	if (!transport || sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
-		/* Recvmsg is supposed to return 0 if a peer performs an
-		 * orderly shutdown. Differentiate between that case and when a
-		 * peer has not connected or a local shutdown occurred with the
-		 * SOCK_DONE flag.
-		 */
-		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
-			err = 0;
-		else
-			err = -ENOTCONN;
-
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (flags & MSG_OOB) {
-		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* We don't check peer_shutdown flag here since peer may actually shut
-	 * down, but there can be data in the queue that a local socket can
-	 * receive.
-	 */
-	if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
-		err = 0;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* It is valid on Linux to pass in a zero-length receive buffer.  This
-	 * is not an error.  We may as well bail out now.
-	 */
-	if (!len) {
-		err = 0;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
 	/* We must not copy less than target bytes into the user's buffer
 	 * before returning successfully, so we wait for the consume queue to
 	 * have that much data to consume before dequeueing.  Note that this
@@ -2013,6 +1970,67 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 	if (copied > 0)
 		err = copied;
 
+out:
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int
+vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
+			  int flags)
+{
+	struct sock *sk;
+	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
+	int err;
+
+	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+
+	sk = sock->sk;
+	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	err = 0;
+
+	lock_sock(sk);
+
+	transport = vsk->transport;
+
+	if (!transport || sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
+		/* Recvmsg is supposed to return 0 if a peer performs an
+		 * orderly shutdown. Differentiate between that case and when a
+		 * peer has not connected or a local shutdown occurred with the
+		 * SOCK_DONE flag.
+		 */
+		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
+			err = 0;
+		else
+			err = -ENOTCONN;
+
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (flags & MSG_OOB) {
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* We don't check peer_shutdown flag here since peer may actually shut
+	 * down, but there can be data in the queue that a local socket can
+	 * receive.
+	 */
+	if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
+		err = 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* It is valid on Linux to pass in a zero-length receive buffer.  This
+	 * is not an error.  We may as well bail out now.
+	 */
+	if (!len) {
+		err = 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = __vsock_stream_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
+
 out:
 	release_sock(sk);
 	return err;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-11 11:07 [PATCH v11 00/18] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:09 ` [PATCH v11 01/18] af_vsock: update functions for connectible socket Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:10 ` [PATCH v11 02/18] af_vsock: separate wait data loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:10 ` Arseny Krasnov [this message]
2021-06-11 11:10 ` [PATCH v11 04/18] af_vsock: implement SEQPACKET receive loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:10 ` [PATCH v11 05/18] af_vsock: implement send logic for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:11 ` [PATCH v11 06/18] af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:11 ` [PATCH v11 07/18] af_vsock: update comments for stream sockets Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:11 ` [PATCH v11 08/18] virtio/vsock: set packet's type in virtio_transport_send_pkt_info() Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:12 ` [PATCH v11 09/18] virtio/vsock: simplify credit update function API Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:12 ` [PATCH v11 10/18] virtio/vsock: defines and constants for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:12 ` [PATCH v11 11/18] virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for SOCK_SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-18 13:44   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-06-18 13:51     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-06-18 14:44       ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-06-18 15:04     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-18 15:55       ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-06-18 16:08         ` [MASSMAIL KLMS] " Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-18 16:25           ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-06-18 16:26             ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-21  6:55               ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-21 10:23                 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-06-21 12:27                   ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:12 ` [PATCH v11 12/18] virtio/vsock: add SEQPACKET receive logic Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:13 ` [PATCH v11 13/18] virtio/vsock: rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:13 ` [PATCH v11 14/18] virtio/vsock: enable SEQPACKET for transport Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:13 ` [PATCH v11 15/18] vhost/vsock: support " Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:13 ` [PATCH v11 16/18] vsock/loopback: enable " Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v11 17/18] vsock_test: add SOCK_SEQPACKET tests Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v11 18/18] virtio/vsock: update trace event for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 11:17 ` [PATCH v11 00/18] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 12:25   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-06-11 14:39     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 14:57       ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-06-11 15:00         ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-06-11 21:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-06-18 13:49   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210611111024.3651284-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com \
    --to=arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com \
    --cc=andraprs@amazon.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nslusarek@gmx.net \
    --cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).