kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactoring find_arch_event() to find_perf_hw_id()
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 20:20:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211116122030.4698-3-likexu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211116122030.4698-1-likexu@tencent.com>

From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>

The find_arch_event() returns a "unsigned int" value,
which is used by the pmc_reprogram_counter() to
program a PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE type perf_event.

The returned value is actually the kernel defined gernic
perf_hw_id, let's rename it to find_perf_hw_id() with simpler
incoming parameters for better self-explanation.

Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c           | 8 +-------
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h           | 3 +--
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c       | 8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 9 +++++----
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 0772bad9165c..903dc6a532cc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ static bool pmc_resume_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
 {
 	unsigned config, type = PERF_TYPE_RAW;
-	u8 event_select, unit_mask;
 	struct kvm *kvm = pmc->vcpu->kvm;
 	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter;
 	int i;
@@ -206,17 +205,12 @@ void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
 	if (!allow_event)
 		return;
 
-	event_select = eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
-	unit_mask = (eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8;
-
 	if (!(eventsel & (ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EDGE |
 			  ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INV |
 			  ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_CMASK |
 			  HSW_IN_TX |
 			  HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED))) {
-		config = kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->find_arch_event(pmc_to_pmu(pmc),
-						      event_select,
-						      unit_mask);
+		config = kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->find_perf_hw_id(pmc);
 		if (config != PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX)
 			type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 0e4f2b1fa9fb..e7a5d4b6fa94 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping {
 };
 
 struct kvm_pmu_ops {
-	unsigned (*find_arch_event)(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u8 event_select,
-				    u8 unit_mask);
+	unsigned int (*find_perf_hw_id)(struct kvm_pmc *pmc);
 	unsigned (*find_fixed_event)(int idx);
 	bool (*pmc_is_enabled)(struct kvm_pmc *pmc);
 	struct kvm_pmc *(*pmc_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
index fdf587f19c5f..1d31bd5c6803 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
@@ -134,10 +134,10 @@ static inline struct kvm_pmc *get_gp_pmc_amd(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u32 msr,
 	return &pmu->gp_counters[msr_to_index(msr)];
 }
 
-static unsigned amd_find_arch_event(struct kvm_pmu *pmu,
-				    u8 event_select,
-				    u8 unit_mask)
+static unsigned int amd_find_perf_hw_id(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 {
+	u8 event_select = pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
+	u8 unit_mask = (pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amd_event_mapping); i++)
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 }
 
 struct kvm_pmu_ops amd_pmu_ops = {
-	.find_arch_event = amd_find_arch_event,
+	.find_perf_hw_id = amd_find_perf_hw_id,
 	.find_fixed_event = amd_find_fixed_event,
 	.pmc_is_enabled = amd_pmc_is_enabled,
 	.pmc_idx_to_pmc = amd_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 51b00dbb2d1e..f1cc6192ead7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -68,10 +68,11 @@ static void global_ctrl_changed(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u64 data)
 		reprogram_counter(pmu, bit);
 }
 
-static unsigned intel_find_arch_event(struct kvm_pmu *pmu,
-				      u8 event_select,
-				      u8 unit_mask)
+static unsigned int intel_find_perf_hw_id(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 {
+	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
+	u8 event_select = pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
+	u8 unit_mask = (pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intel_arch_events); i++)
@@ -720,7 +721,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 }
 
 struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
-	.find_arch_event = intel_find_arch_event,
+	.find_perf_hw_id = intel_find_perf_hw_id,
 	.find_fixed_event = intel_find_fixed_event,
 	.pmc_is_enabled = intel_pmc_is_enabled,
 	.pmc_idx_to_pmc = intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
-- 
2.33.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-16 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-16 12:20 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/pmu: An insightful refactoring of vPMU code Like Xu
2021-11-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup pmc->eventsel for fixed PMCs Like Xu
2021-11-16 12:20 ` Like Xu [this message]
2021-11-18 13:29   ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactoring find_arch_event() to find_perf_hw_id() Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Reuse find_perf_hw_id() and drop find_fixed_event() Like Xu
2021-11-18 14:43   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-18 15:00   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-19  7:16     ` Like Xu
2021-11-19 10:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-19 11:10         ` Like Xu
2021-11-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactoring kvm_perf_overflow{_intr}() Like Xu
2021-11-18 14:53   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211116122030.4698-3-likexu@tencent.com \
    --to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).