From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Harish Barathvajasankar <hbarath@google.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out logic to atomically install a new page table
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 23:57:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119235759.1304274-5-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119235759.1304274-1-dmatlack@google.com>
Factor out the logic to atomically replace an SPTE with an SPTE that
points to a new page table. This will be used in a follow-up commit to
split a large page SPTE into one level lower.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index cc9fe33c9b36..9ee3f4f7fdf5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -945,6 +945,39 @@ static int tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * tdp_mmu_install_sp_atomic - Atomically replace the given spte with an
+ * spte pointing to the provided page table.
+ *
+ * @kvm: kvm instance
+ * @iter: a tdp_iter instance currently on the SPTE that should be set
+ * @sp: The new TDP page table to install.
+ * @account_nx: True if this page table is being installed to split a
+ * non-executable huge page.
+ *
+ * Returns: True if the new page table was installed. False if spte being
+ * replaced changed, causing the atomic compare-exchange to fail.
+ * If this function returns false the sp will be freed before
+ * returning.
+ */
+static bool tdp_mmu_install_sp_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct tdp_iter *iter,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+ bool account_nx)
+{
+ u64 spte;
+
+ spte = make_nonleaf_spte(sp->spt, !shadow_accessed_mask);
+
+ if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, iter, spte)) {
+ tdp_mmu_link_page(kvm, sp, account_nx);
+ return true;
+ } else {
+ tdp_mmu_free_sp(sp);
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Handle a TDP page fault (NPT/EPT violation/misconfiguration) by installing
* page tables and SPTEs to translate the faulting guest physical address.
@@ -954,8 +987,6 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
struct kvm_mmu *mmu = vcpu->arch.mmu;
struct tdp_iter iter;
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
- u64 *child_pt;
- u64 new_spte;
int ret;
kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(vcpu, fault);
@@ -983,6 +1014,9 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
}
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte)) {
+ bool account_nx = fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
+ fault->req_level >= iter.level;
+
/*
* If SPTE has been frozen by another thread, just
* give up and retry, avoiding unnecessary page table
@@ -992,21 +1026,8 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
break;
sp = alloc_tdp_mmu_page(vcpu, iter.gfn, iter.level - 1);
- child_pt = sp->spt;
-
- new_spte = make_nonleaf_spte(child_pt,
- !shadow_accessed_mask);
-
- if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(vcpu->kvm, &iter, new_spte)) {
- tdp_mmu_link_page(vcpu->kvm, sp,
- fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
- fault->req_level >= iter.level);
-
- trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, true);
- } else {
- tdp_mmu_free_sp(sp);
+ if (!tdp_mmu_install_sp_atomic(vcpu->kvm, &iter, sp, account_nx))
break;
- }
}
}
--
2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-19 23:57 [RFC PATCH 00/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Eager Page Splitting for the TDP MMU David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename rmap_write_protect to kvm_vcpu_write_protect_gfn David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:52 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-26 12:18 ` Peter Xu
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename __rmap_write_protect to rmap_write_protect David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:52 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-26 12:18 ` Peter Xu
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Automatically update iter->old_spte if cmpxchg fails David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:52 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-30 23:25 ` David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` David Matlack [this message]
2021-11-22 18:52 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out logic to atomically install a new page table Ben Gardon
2021-11-30 23:27 ` David Matlack
2021-12-01 19:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01 21:52 ` David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Abstract mmu caches out to a separate struct David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:55 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 18:55 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-30 23:28 ` David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive page role from parent David Matlack
2021-11-20 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-27 2:07 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-11-27 10:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-30 23:31 ` David Matlack
2021-12-01 0:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01 21:56 ` David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass in vcpu->arch.mmu_caches instead of vcpu David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:56 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Helper method to check for large and present sptes David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:56 ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-01 18:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01 21:13 ` David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Move restore_acc_track_spte to spte.c David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:56 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Abstract need_resched logic from tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:56 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor tdp_mmu iterators to take kvm_mmu_page root David Matlack
2021-11-22 18:56 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Split large pages when dirty logging is enabled David Matlack
2021-11-22 5:05 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2021-11-30 23:33 ` David Matlack
2021-11-22 19:30 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-30 23:44 ` David Matlack
2021-11-26 12:01 ` Peter Xu
2021-11-30 23:56 ` David Matlack
2021-12-01 1:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01 1:29 ` David Matlack
2021-12-01 2:29 ` Peter Xu
2021-12-01 18:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01 21:36 ` David Matlack
2021-12-01 23:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-02 17:41 ` David Matlack
2021-12-02 18:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-03 0:00 ` David Matlack
2021-12-03 1:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-03 17:22 ` David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Split large pages during CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG David Matlack
2021-11-26 12:17 ` Peter Xu
2021-12-01 0:16 ` David Matlack
2021-12-01 0:17 ` David Matlack
2021-12-01 4:03 ` Peter Xu
2021-12-01 22:14 ` David Matlack
2021-12-03 4:57 ` Peter Xu
2021-12-01 19:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01 19:49 ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-01 20:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01 22:11 ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-01 22:17 ` David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Add tracepoint for splitting large pages David Matlack
2021-11-19 23:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats when " David Matlack
2021-12-01 19:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-01 21:11 ` David Matlack
2021-11-26 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Eager Page Splitting for the TDP MMU Peter Xu
2021-11-30 23:22 ` David Matlack
2021-12-01 4:10 ` Peter Xu
2021-12-01 4:19 ` Peter Xu
2021-12-01 21:46 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211119235759.1304274-5-dmatlack@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=hbarath@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=scgl@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).