kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Add strict mode to specification exception interpretation test
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:47:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125144726.1414645-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82750b44-6246-3f3c-4562-3d64d7378448@redhat.com>

While specification exception interpretation is not required to occur,
it can be useful for automatic regression testing to fail the test if it
does not occur.
Add a `--strict` argument to enable this.
`--strict` takes a list of machine types (as reported by STIDP)
for which to enable strict mode, for example
`--strict 8562,8561,3907,3906,2965,2964`
will enable it for models z15 - z13.
Alternatively, strict mode can be enabled for all but the listed machine
types by prefixing the list with a `!`, for example
`--strict !1090,1091,2064,2066,2084,2086,2094,2096,2097,2098,2817,2818,2827,2828`
will enable it for z/Architecture models except those older than z13.

Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
---

Apparently my message with inline patch did not make it to the mailing
list for some reason, so here's the patch again.

 s390x/spec_ex-sie.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/s390x/spec_ex-sie.c b/s390x/spec_ex-sie.c
index 5dea411..9a063f9 100644
--- a/s390x/spec_ex-sie.c
+++ b/s390x/spec_ex-sie.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
  * specification exception interpretation is off/on.
  */
 #include <libcflat.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
 #include <sclp.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/arch_def.h>
@@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ static void reset_guest(void)
 	vm.sblk->icptcode = 0;
 }
 
-static void test_spec_ex_sie(void)
+static void test_spec_ex_sie(bool strict)
 {
 	setup_guest();
 
@@ -61,14 +62,60 @@ static void test_spec_ex_sie(void)
 	report(vm.sblk->icptcode == ICPT_PROGI
 	       && vm.sblk->iprcc == PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION,
 	       "Received specification exception intercept");
-	if (vm.sblk->gpsw.addr == 0xdeadbeee)
-		report_info("Interpreted initial exception, intercepted invalid program new PSW exception");
-	else
-		report_info("Did not interpret initial exception");
+	{
+		const char *msg;
+
+		msg = "Interpreted initial exception, intercepted invalid program new PSW exception";
+		if (strict)
+			report(vm.sblk->gpsw.addr == 0xdeadbeee, msg);
+		else if (vm.sblk->gpsw.addr == 0xdeadbeee)
+			report_info(msg);
+		else
+			report_info("Did not interpret initial exception");
+	}
 	report_prefix_pop();
 	report_prefix_pop();
 }
 
+static bool parse_strict(char **argv)
+{
+	uint16_t machine_id;
+	char *list;
+	bool ret;
+
+	if (!*argv)
+		return false;
+	if (strcmp("--strict", *argv))
+		return false;
+
+	machine_id = get_machine_id();
+	list = argv[1];
+	if (!list) {
+		printf("No argument to --strict, ignoring\n");
+		return false;
+	}
+	if (list[0] == '!') {
+		ret = true;
+		list++;
+	} else
+		ret = false;
+	while (true) {
+		long input = 0;
+
+		if (strlen(list) == 0)
+			return ret;
+		input = strtol(list, &list, 16);
+		if (*list == ',')
+			list++;
+		else if (*list != '\0')
+			break;
+		if (input == machine_id)
+			return !ret;
+	}
+	printf("Invalid --strict argument \"%s\", ignoring\n", list);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	if (!sclp_facilities.has_sief2) {
@@ -76,7 +123,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	test_spec_ex_sie();
+	test_spec_ex_sie(parse_strict(argv + 1));
 out:
 	return report_summary();
 }
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22 13:10 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/1] Test spec exception interception Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-22 13:10 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/1] s390x: Add specification exception interception test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-25 12:25   ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-11  7:47   ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-16 11:57     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-11-25 14:47     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2021-12-03 11:15       ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Add strict mode to specification exception interpretation test Thomas Huth
2021-12-03 11:46         ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-25 17:23 Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-28 13:27 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-03  9:43   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211125144726.1414645-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).