kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
	david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/4] s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:25:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220111122526.60e31b38@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220110133755.22238-4-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:37:54 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> We check the PTF instruction.
> 
> - We do not expect to support vertical polarization.
> 
> - We do not expect the Modified Topology Change Report to be
> pending or not at the moment the first PTF instruction with
> PTF_CHECK function code is done as some code already did run
> a polarization change may have occur.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  s390x/Makefile      |   1 +
>  s390x/topology.c    | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/unittests.cfg |   3 ++
>  3 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 s390x/topology.c
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index 1e567c11..fa21a882 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/edat.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex-sie.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/firq.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/topology.elf
>  
>  tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
>  ifneq ($(HOST_KEY_DOCUMENT),)
> diff --git a/s390x/topology.c b/s390x/topology.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..a227555e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/topology.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * CPU Topology
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 IBM Corp

Copyright IBM Corp. 2021

> + *
> + * Authors:
> + *  Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
> +#include <smp.h>
> +#include <sclp.h>
> +#include <s390x/vm.h>
> +
> +#define PTF_REQ_HORIZONTAL	0
> +#define PTF_REQ_VERTICAL	1
> +#define PTF_REQ_CHECK		2
> +
> +#define PTF_ERR_NO_REASON	0
> +#define PTF_ERR_ALRDY_POLARIZED	1
> +#define PTF_ERR_IN_PROGRESS	2
> +
> +static int ptf(unsigned long fc, unsigned long *rc)
> +{
> +	int cc;
> +
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"       .insn   rre,0xb9a20000,%1,0\n"
> +		"       ipm     %0\n"
> +		"       srl     %0,28\n"
> +		: "=d" (cc), "+d" (fc)
> +		: "d" (fc)
> +		: "cc");
> +
> +	*rc = fc >> 8;
> +	return cc;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_ptf(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long rc;
> +	int cc;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("Topology Report pending");
> +	/*
> +	 * At this moment the topology may already have changed
> +	 * since the VM has been started.
> +	 * However, we can test if a second PTF instruction
> +	 * reports that the topology did not change since the
> +	 * preceding PFT instruction.
> +	 */
> +	ptf(PTF_REQ_CHECK, &rc);
> +	cc = ptf(PTF_REQ_CHECK, &rc);
> +	report(cc == 0, "PTF check should clear topology report");
> +
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("Topology polarisation check");
> +	/*
> +	 * We can not assume the state of the polarization for
> +	 * any Virtual Machine but KVM.
> +	 * Let's skip the polarisation tests for other VMs.
> +	 */
> +	if (!vm_is_kvm()) {
> +		report_skip("Topology polarisation check is done for KVM only");
> +		goto end;
> +	}
> +
> +	cc = ptf(PTF_REQ_HORIZONTAL, &rc);
> +	report(cc == 2 && rc == PTF_ERR_ALRDY_POLARIZED,
> +	       "KVM always provides horizontal polarization");
> +
> +	cc = ptf(PTF_REQ_VERTICAL, &rc);
> +	report(cc == 2 && rc == PTF_ERR_NO_REASON,
> +	       "KVM doesn't support vertical polarization.");
> +
> +end:
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static struct {
> +	const char *name;
> +	void (*func)(void);
> +} tests[] = {
> +	{ "PTF", test_ptf},
> +	{ NULL, NULL }
> +};
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("CPU Topology");
> +
> +	if (!test_facility(11)) {
> +		report_skip("Topology facility not present");
> +		goto end;
> +	}
> +
> +	report_info("Machine level %ld", stsi_get_fc());
> +
> +	for (i = 0; tests[i].name; i++) {
> +		report_prefix_push(tests[i].name);
> +		tests[i].func();
> +		report_prefix_pop();
> +	}
> +end:
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +	return report_summary();
> +}
> diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> index 054560c2..e2d3e6a5 100644
> --- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> @@ -122,3 +122,6 @@ extra_params = -smp 1,maxcpus=3 -cpu qemu -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=1 -devi
>  file = firq.elf
>  timeout = 20
>  extra_params = -smp 1,maxcpus=3 -cpu qemu -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=2 -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=1
> +
> +[topology]
> +file = topology.elf


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-11 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-10 13:37 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/4] S390x: CPU Topology Information Pierre Morel
2022-01-10 13:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/4] s390x: lib: Add SCLP toplogy nested level Pierre Morel
2022-01-10 13:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/4] s390x: stsi: Define vm_is_kvm to be used in different tests Pierre Morel
2022-01-11 12:27   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-17 14:57     ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18  8:35       ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-18 17:07         ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-11 13:08   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-17 15:05     ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-10 13:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/4] s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function Pierre Morel
2022-01-11 11:25   ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2022-01-17 15:07     ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-10 13:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/4] s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information Pierre Morel
2022-01-11 13:30   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-17 15:14     ` Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220111122526.60e31b38@p-imbrenda \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).