kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	Jane Malalane <jane.malalane@citrix.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org (open list:CRYPTO API)
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/cpuid: refactor setup_clear_cpu_cap()/clear_cpu_cap()
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:11:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220718141123.136106-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220718141123.136106-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

Currently setup_clear_cpu_cap passes NULL 'struct cpuinfo_x86*'
to clear_cpu_cap to indicate that capability should be cleared from boot_cpu_data.

Later that is used in clear_feature to do recursive call to
clear_cpu_cap together with clearing the feature bit from 'cpu_caps_cleared'

Remove that code and just call the do_clear_cpu_cap on boot_cpu_data directly
from the setup_clear_cpu_cap.

The only functional change this introduces is that now calling clear_cpu_cap
explicitly on boot_cpu_data also sets the bits in cpu_caps_cleared,
which is the only thing that makes sense anyway.

All callers of both functions were checked for this and fixed.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c | 17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
index c881bcafba7d70..d6777d07ba3302 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
@@ -88,18 +88,16 @@ static inline void clear_feature(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int feature)
 	 * rest of the cpufeature code uses atomics as well, so keep it for
 	 * consistency. Cleanup all of it separately.
 	 */
-	if (!c) {
-		clear_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, feature);
+	clear_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)c->x86_capability);
+
+	if (c == &boot_cpu_data)
 		set_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared);
-	} else {
-		clear_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)c->x86_capability);
-	}
 }
 
 /* Take the capabilities and the BUG bits into account */
 #define MAX_FEATURE_BITS ((NCAPINTS + NBUGINTS) * sizeof(u32) * 8)
 
-static void do_clear_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int feature)
+void clear_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int feature)
 {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(disable, MAX_FEATURE_BITS);
 	const struct cpuid_dep *d;
@@ -129,12 +127,7 @@ static void do_clear_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int feature)
 	} while (changed);
 }
 
-void clear_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int feature)
-{
-	do_clear_cpu_cap(c, feature);
-}
-
 void setup_clear_cpu_cap(unsigned int feature)
 {
-	do_clear_cpu_cap(NULL, feature);
+	clear_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, feature);
 }
-- 
2.34.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-18 14:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] x86: cpuid: improve support for broken CPUID configurations Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf/x86/intel/lbr: use setup_clear_cpu_cap instead of clear_cpu_cap Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-19 14:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-09-20  8:20     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-26 13:12       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-09-28 10:49         ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-20  8:59           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-20  9:05             ` Herbert Xu
2022-10-20 10:21               ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-20 11:13                 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-22 21:08             ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-11-02 13:40             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-02 14:27               ` Elliott, Robert (Servers)
2022-11-02 16:23                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-11-02 18:19                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-11-02 19:14                     ` Elliott, Robert (Servers)
2022-11-03 13:26                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-03 13:30                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-18 14:11 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-10-21 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/cpuid: refactor setup_clear_cpu_cap()/clear_cpu_cap() Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 19:10     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 21:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/cpuid: move filter_cpuid_features to cpuid-deps.c Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/cpuid: remove 'warn' parameter from filter_cpuid_features Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86/cpuid: check for dependencies violations in CPUID and attempt to fix them Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-28  7:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] x86: cpuid: improve support for broken CPUID configurations Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-01 16:05   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-01 16:31     ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-01 16:41       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-19 13:43     ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220718141123.136106-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jane.malalane@citrix.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).