kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover Intel Arch PMU Version 1
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:09:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220819110939.78013-11-likexu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819110939.78013-1-likexu@tencent.com>

From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>

For most unit tests, the basic framework and use cases which test
any PMU counter do not require any changes, except for two things:

- No access to registers introduced only in PMU version 2 and above;
- Expanded tolerance for testing counter overflows
  due to the loss of uniform control of the gloabl_ctrl register

Adding some pmu_version() return value checks can seamlessly support
Intel Arch PMU Version 1, while opening the door for AMD PMUs tests.

Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
---
 x86/pmu.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
index 25fafbe..826472c 100644
--- a/x86/pmu.c
+++ b/x86/pmu.c
@@ -125,14 +125,19 @@ static struct pmu_event* get_counter_event(pmu_counter_t *cnt)
 
 static void global_enable(pmu_counter_t *cnt)
 {
-	cnt->idx = event_to_global_idx(cnt);
+	if (pmu_version() < 2)
+		return;
 
+	cnt->idx = event_to_global_idx(cnt);
 	wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL) |
 			(1ull << cnt->idx));
 }
 
 static void global_disable(pmu_counter_t *cnt)
 {
+	if (pmu_version() < 2)
+		return;
+
 	wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL) &
 			~(1ull << cnt->idx));
 }
@@ -301,7 +306,10 @@ static void check_counter_overflow(void)
 	count = cnt.count;
 
 	/* clear status before test */
-	wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS));
+	if (pmu_version() > 1) {
+		wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
+		      rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS));
+	}
 
 	report_prefix_push("overflow");
 
@@ -327,13 +335,21 @@ static void check_counter_overflow(void)
 			cnt.config &= ~EVNTSEL_INT;
 		idx = event_to_global_idx(&cnt);
 		__measure(&cnt, cnt.count);
-		report(cnt.count == 1, "cntr-%d", i);
+
+		report(check_irq() == (i % 2), "irq-%d", i);
+		if (pmu_version() > 1)
+			report(cnt.count == 1, "cntr-%d", i);
+		else
+			report(cnt.count < 4, "cntr-%d", i);
+
+		if (pmu_version() < 2)
+			continue;
+
 		status = rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS);
 		report(status & (1ull << idx), "status-%d", i);
 		wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, status);
 		status = rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS);
 		report(!(status & (1ull << idx)), "status clear-%d", i);
-		report(check_irq() == (i % 2), "irq-%d", i);
 	}
 
 	report_prefix_pop();
@@ -440,8 +456,10 @@ static void check_running_counter_wrmsr(void)
 	report(evt.count < gp_events[1].min, "cntr");
 
 	/* clear status before overflow test */
-	wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
-	      rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS));
+	if (pmu_version() > 1) {
+		wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
+			rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS));
+	}
 
 	start_event(&evt);
 
@@ -453,8 +471,11 @@ static void check_running_counter_wrmsr(void)
 
 	loop();
 	stop_event(&evt);
-	status = rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS);
-	report(status & 1, "status");
+
+	if (pmu_version() > 1) {
+		status = rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS);
+		report(status & 1, "status");
+	}
 
 	report_prefix_pop();
 }
@@ -474,8 +495,10 @@ static void check_emulated_instr(void)
 	};
 	report_prefix_push("emulated instruction");
 
-	wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
-	      rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS));
+	if (pmu_version() > 1) {
+		wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
+			rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS));
+	}
 
 	start_event(&brnch_cnt);
 	start_event(&instr_cnt);
@@ -509,7 +532,8 @@ static void check_emulated_instr(void)
 		:
 		: "eax", "ebx", "ecx", "edx");
 
-	wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
+	if (pmu_version() > 1)
+		wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
 
 	stop_event(&brnch_cnt);
 	stop_event(&instr_cnt);
@@ -520,10 +544,13 @@ static void check_emulated_instr(void)
 	       "instruction count");
 	report(brnch_cnt.count - brnch_start >= EXPECTED_BRNCH,
 	       "branch count");
-	// Additionally check that those counters overflowed properly.
-	status = rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS);
-	report(status & 1, "instruction counter overflow");
-	report(status & 2, "branch counter overflow");
+
+	if (pmu_version() > 1) {
+		// Additionally check that those counters overflowed properly.
+		status = rdmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS);
+		report(status & 1, "instruction counter overflow");
+		report(status & 2, "branch counter overflow");
+	}
 
 	report_prefix_pop();
 }
@@ -647,12 +674,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
 	buf = malloc(N*64);
 
 	if (!pmu_version()) {
-		report_skip("No pmu is detected!");
-		return report_summary();
-	}
-
-	if (pmu_version() == 1) {
-		report_skip("PMU version 1 is not supported.");
+		report_skip("No Intel Arch PMU is detected!");
 		return report_summary();
 	}
 
-- 
2.37.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-19 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-19 11:09 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/13] x86/pmu: Test case optimization, fixes and additions Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/13] x86/pmu: Introduce __start_event() to drop all of the manual zeroing Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/13] x86/pmu: Introduce multiple_{one, many}() to improve readability Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/13] x86/pmu: Reset the expected count of the fixed counter 0 when i386 Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:18   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17  7:30     ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 19:16       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/13] x86/pmu: Add tests for Intel Processor Event Based Sampling (PEBS) Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-05 22:22     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/13] x86: create pmu group for quick pmu-scope testing Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/13] x86/pmu: Test emulation instructions on full-width counters Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/13] x86/pmu: Pop up FW prefix to avoid out-of-context propagation Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/13] x86/pmu: Add PDCM check before accessing PERF_CAP register Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/13] x86/pmu: Report SKIP when testing Intel LBR on AMD platforms Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` Like Xu [this message]
2022-09-06  7:15   ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover Intel Arch PMU Version 1 Sandipan Das
2022-09-06 13:28     ` Like Xu
2022-09-06  8:16   ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-06 13:35     ` Like Xu
2022-09-08  8:23       ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-19  7:09         ` Like Xu
2022-10-21  7:32           ` Like Xu
2022-10-25  8:34             ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:35   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-18  9:32     ` Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/13] x86/pmu: Refine message when testing PMU on AMD platforms Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/13] x86/pmu: Add assignment framework for Intel-specific HW resources Like Xu
2022-09-06  7:19   ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-21  7:21     ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 18:22       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover AMD PMU Like Xu
2022-09-06  7:32   ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:48   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220819110939.78013-11-likexu@tencent.com \
    --to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).