kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 16/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Wrap uses of kvm_handle_gfn_range in mmu.c
Date: Thu,  2 Feb 2023 18:28:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230202182809.1929122-17-bgardon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230202182809.1929122-1-bgardon@google.com>

handle_gfn_range + callback is not a bad interface, but it requires
exporting the whole callback scheme to mmu.c. Simplify the interface
with some basic wrapper functions, making the callback scheme internal
to shadow_mmu.c.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c        |  8 +++---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h | 25 ++++------------
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 44a00396284d5..156ab2e4cd811 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool flush = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		flush = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_zap_rmap);
+		flush = kvm_shadow_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range);
 
 	if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
 		flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range, flush);
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool flush = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		flush = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_set_pte_rmap);
+		flush = kvm_shadow_mmu_set_spte_gfn(kvm, range);
 
 	if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
 		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_set_spte_gfn(kvm, range);
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool young = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_age_rmap);
+		young = kvm_shadow_mmu_age_gfn_range(kvm, range);
 
 	if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
 		young |= kvm_tdp_mmu_age_gfn_range(kvm, range);
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool young = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_test_age_rmap);
+		young = kvm_shadow_mmu_test_age_gfn(kvm, range);
 
 	if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
 		young |= kvm_tdp_mmu_test_age_gfn(kvm, range);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c
index dc5c4b9899cc6..dfff65db97c3b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c
@@ -864,16 +864,16 @@ static bool __kvm_zap_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 	return kvm_zap_all_rmap_sptes(kvm, rmap_head);
 }
 
-bool kvm_zap_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		  pte_t unused)
+static bool kvm_zap_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			 struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+			 pte_t unused)
 {
 	return __kvm_zap_rmap(kvm, rmap_head, slot);
 }
 
-bool kvm_set_pte_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		      pte_t pte)
+static bool kvm_set_pte_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+			     pte_t pte)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -980,9 +980,13 @@ static void slot_rmap_walk_next(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
 	     slot_rmap_walk_okay(_iter_);				\
 	     slot_rmap_walk_next(_iter_))
 
-__always_inline bool kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm,
-					  struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
-					  rmap_handler_t handler)
+typedef bool (*rmap_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+			       int level, pte_t pte);
+
+static __always_inline bool
+kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
+		     rmap_handler_t handler)
 {
 	struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator iterator;
 	bool ret = false;
@@ -995,9 +999,9 @@ __always_inline bool kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		  pte_t unused)
+static bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			 struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+			 pte_t unused)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -1009,9 +1013,9 @@ bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 	return young;
 }
 
-bool kvm_test_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
-		       int level, pte_t unused)
+static bool kvm_test_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+			      int level, pte_t unused)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -3523,3 +3527,23 @@ void kvm_shadow_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
 	walk_slot_rmaps(kvm, memslot, slot_rmap_write_protect,
 			start_level, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, false);
 }
+
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_zap_rmap);
+}
+
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_set_pte_rmap);
+}
+
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_age_rmap);
+}
+
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_test_age_rmap);
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h
index 36fe8013931d2..e4fbc842f524e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h
@@ -39,26 +39,6 @@ struct pte_list_desc {
 /* Only exported for debugfs.c. */
 unsigned int pte_list_count(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head);
 
-bool kvm_zap_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		  pte_t unused);
-bool kvm_set_pte_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		      pte_t pte);
-
-typedef bool (*rmap_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-			       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
-			       int level, pte_t pte);
-bool kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
-			  rmap_handler_t handler);
-
-bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		  pte_t unused);
-bool kvm_test_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
-		       int level, pte_t unused);
-
 void __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
 
 bool __kvm_shadow_mmu_prepare_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
@@ -114,6 +94,11 @@ void kvm_shadow_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
 				const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
 				int start_level);
 
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+
 /* Exports from paging_tmpl.h */
 gpa_t paging32_gva_to_gpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
 			  gpa_t vaddr, u64 access,
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-02 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-02 18:27 [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Formalize the Shadow MMU Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename slot rmap walkers to add clarity and clean up code Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 02/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace comment with an actual lockdep assertion on mmu_lock Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 03/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Clean up mmu.c functions that put return type on separate line Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 04/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Add shadow_mmu.(c|h) Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 05/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for the Shadow MMU Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 06/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Get rid of is_cpuid_PSE36() Ben Gardon
2023-03-20 18:51   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 08/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for paging_tmpl.h Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 09/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Move paging_tmpl.h includes to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-03-20 18:41   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-21 18:43     ` Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 10/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Clean up Shadow MMU exports Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 11/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Cleanup shrinker interface with Shadow MMU Ben Gardon
2023-02-04 13:52   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-04 19:10   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 12/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Clean up naming of exported Shadow MMU functions Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 13/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Fix naming on prepare / commit zap page functions Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 14/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Factor Shadow MMU wrprot / clear dirty ops out of mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 15/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Remove unneeded exports from shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-04 14:44   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-02 18:28 ` Ben Gardon [this message]
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 17/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Add kvm_shadow_mmu_ to the last few functions in shadow_mmu.h Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 18/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Move split cache topup functions to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 19/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Move Shadow MMU part of kvm_mmu_zap_all() to shadow_mmu.h Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 20/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Move Shadow MMU init/teardown to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 21/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Split out Shadow MMU lockless walk begin/end Ben Gardon
2023-03-20 19:09 ` [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Formalize the Shadow MMU Sean Christopherson
2023-03-23 23:02 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230202182809.1929122-17-bgardon@google.com \
    --to=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vipinsh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).