From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] KVM: arm64: Start handling SMCs from EL1
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 22:09:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230320221002.4191007-6-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320221002.4191007-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Whelp, the architecture gods have spoken and confirmed that the function
ID space is common between SMCs and HVCs. Not only that, the expectation
is that hypervisors handle calls to both SMC and HVC conduits. KVM
recently picked up support for SMCCCs in commit bd36b1a9eb5a ("KVM:
arm64: nv: Handle SMCs taken from virtual EL2") but scoped it only to a
nested hypervisor.
Let's just open the floodgates and let EL1 access our SMCCC
implementation with the SMC instruction as well.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 5e4f9737cbd5..68f95dcd41a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -72,13 +72,15 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*
* We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
* otherwise return to the same address...
- *
- * Only handle SMCs from the virtual EL2 with an immediate of zero and
- * skip it otherwise.
*/
- if (!vcpu_is_el2(vcpu) || kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu)) {
+ kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
+
+ /*
+ * SMCs with a nonzero immediate are reserved according to DEN0028E 2.9
+ * "SMC and HVC immediate value".
+ */
+ if (kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu)) {
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
- kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
return 1;
}
@@ -93,8 +95,6 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (ret < 0)
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
- kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
-
return ret;
}
--
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-20 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-20 22:09 [PATCH 00/11] KVM: arm64: Userspace SMCCC call filtering Oliver Upton
2023-03-20 22:09 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: x86: Redefine 'longmode' as a flag for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL Oliver Upton
2023-03-21 15:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-21 17:36 ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-20 22:09 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: arm64: Add a helper to check if a VM has ran once Oliver Upton
2023-03-21 9:42 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-03-21 16:29 ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-20 22:09 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: arm64: Add vm fd device attribute accessors Oliver Upton
2023-03-21 9:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-03-21 16:49 ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-28 8:39 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-03-28 8:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-03-20 22:09 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: arm64: Rename SMC/HVC call handler to reflect reality Oliver Upton
2023-03-21 9:52 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-03-28 8:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-03-20 22:09 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2023-03-28 8:52 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: arm64: Start handling SMCs from EL1 Suzuki K Poulose
2023-03-28 14:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-20 22:09 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: arm64: Refactor hvc filtering to support different actions Oliver Upton
2023-03-28 9:19 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-03-20 22:09 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: arm64: Use a maple tree to represent the SMCCC filter Oliver Upton
2023-03-20 22:09 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: arm64: Add support for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL Oliver Upton
2023-03-20 22:10 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: arm64: Indroduce support for userspace SMCCC filtering Oliver Upton
2023-03-20 22:10 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: selftests: Add a helper for SMCCC calls with SMC instruction Oliver Upton
2023-03-20 22:10 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add test for SMCCC filter Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230320221002.4191007-6-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).