From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, kim.phillips@amd.com,
piotrgorski@cachyos.org, oleksandr@natalenko.name,
arjan@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, mimoja@mimoja.de, hewenliang4@huawei.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, seanjc@google.com,
pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, fam.zheng@bytedance.com,
punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, simon.evans@bytedance.com,
liangma@liangbit.com, gpiccoli@igalia.com,
Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 8/8] x86/smpboot: Allow parallel bringup for SEV-ES
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 21:32:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230327193210.GCZCHvOmg0aT+CWorC@fat_crate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0e76d1de1e90aafa2d14f95648fff2569b21a73.camel@infradead.org>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:14:27PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Shouldn't the rest of head64.c have the stack protector disabled, for
> similar reasons?
Not aware of any reason to that so far...
> Hm, doesn't most of that just go away (or at least become "Already
> Broken; Someone Else's Problem™") if you just concede to put your new C
> function into head64.c along with a whole bunch of other existing
> CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT support?
If it were only that, maybe, but we have to do the stack __va() thing as
Tom explained. So the jumping-through-hoops just to have a simple
function in C is not worth it... IMNSVHO, that is.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-27 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-21 19:40 [PATCH v16 0/8] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64 Usama Arif
2023-03-21 19:40 ` [PATCH v16 1/8] cpu/hotplug: Move idle_thread_get() to <linux/smpboot.h> Usama Arif
2023-03-21 19:40 ` [PATCH v16 2/8] cpu/hotplug: Reset task stack state in _cpu_up() Usama Arif
2023-03-22 11:06 ` Mark Rutland
2023-03-21 19:40 ` [PATCH v16 3/8] cpu/hotplug: Add dynamic parallel bringup states before CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU Usama Arif
2023-03-23 22:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-23 22:49 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-23 23:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-24 0:06 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-23 23:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-23 23:12 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-24 1:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-24 9:31 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-24 13:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-24 15:33 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-24 14:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-24 9:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-24 10:00 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-27 18:48 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-21 19:40 ` [PATCH v16 4/8] x86/smpboot: Split up native_cpu_up into separate phases and document them Usama Arif
2023-03-21 19:40 ` [PATCH v16 5/8] x86/smpboot: Support parallel startup of secondary CPUs Usama Arif
2023-03-21 19:40 ` [PATCH v16 6/8] x86/smpboot: Send INIT/SIPI/SIPI to secondary CPUs in parallel Usama Arif
2023-03-21 19:40 ` [PATCH v16 7/8] x86/smpboot: Serialize topology updates for secondary bringup Usama Arif
2023-03-21 19:40 ` [PATCH v16 8/8] x86/smpboot: Allow parallel bringup for SEV-ES Usama Arif
2023-03-22 22:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-23 8:32 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-23 8:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-23 9:04 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-23 14:23 ` Brian Gerst
2023-03-27 17:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-27 18:14 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-27 19:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-03-27 19:32 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2023-03-23 13:16 ` Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <751f572f940220775054dc09324b20b929d7d66d.camel@amazon.co.uk>
2023-03-23 18:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-03-23 22:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-23 22:30 ` [EXTERNAL][PATCH " David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230327193210.GCZCHvOmg0aT+CWorC@fat_crate.local \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=hewenliang4@huawei.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liangma@liangbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimoja@mimoja.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=piotrgorski@cachyos.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sabrapan@amazon.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=simon.evans@bytedance.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=usama.arif@bytedance.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).