On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 09:20:35AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote: > > > On 23/04/2024 18:30, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 04:26:41PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote: > >> Add description for the Ssdbltrp ISA extension which is not yet > >> ratified. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 6 ++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > >> index 63d81dc895e5..ce7021dbb556 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > >> @@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ properties: > >> and mode-based filtering as ratified at commit 01d1df0 ("Add ability > >> to manually trigger workflow. (#2)") of riscv-count-overflow. > >> > >> + - const: ssdbltrp > >> + description: | > >> + The standard Ssdbltrp supervisor-level extension for double trap > >> + handling as currently defined by commit e85847b ("Merge pull request > >> + #32 from ved-rivos/0415_1 ") of riscv-double-trap. > > > > I see the proposed ratification for this is Sept 2024, and is marked as > > "Freeze Approved". Do you know when it is going to be frozen? Until > > this, I can't ack this patch. I had a look in the RVI JIRA > > https://jira.riscv.org/browse/RVS-2291?src=confmacro > > and it looks imminent, but it's unclear to me whether it actually has > > been or not. > > Hi Conor, > > Yeah, this series is a RFC since the spec is not yet ratified nor frozen > and its purpose is actually to get to a frozen state. As to when this > will be ratified, I guess Ved can probably answer that. Usually I'd just not ack the RFC patches, but I do at least check how far they might be from frozen before I move on, The jira for this one says "Actual ARC Freeze Approval: 18/Apr/24", which made me think a freeze was gonna happen soon.