From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2A2C7618E for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 19:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229568AbjCRTGQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 15:06:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46606 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229488AbjCRTGQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 15:06:16 -0400 Received: from raptorengineering.com (mail.raptorengineering.com [23.155.224.40]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25B0132DD for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 12:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rptsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D78737E3A91F5; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:06:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.rptsys.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vali.starlink.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id vOHgNumnWw4D; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:06:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rptsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E149037E3A91F1; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:06:10 -0500 (CDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.rptsys.com E149037E3A91F1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raptorengineering.com; s=B8E824E6-0BE2-11E6-931D-288C65937AAD; t=1679166370; bh=tFEPMhwT34mK+wj8HRIYX2GIZdNKI6YHgf1brhfccmY=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=PoMVTuDZc1o5xO9fmDK9sCAyFnT/Icm6H51WwPWnaukwPqRdP+s/xsxSXx06rngxP QRjA3iyhCNMfcYMfergEfdRDvmcKmfN9H4K3oT+T8H0Ps16sp6J1RLfUss0LEvsP6i NiXThxKLqBm/t8L6ITQKMeyzx+T6fWghj58s4Xv0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rptsys.com Received: from mail.rptsys.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vali.starlink.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id VYnaHQQPHGN4; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:06:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from vali.starlink.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rptsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72FA37E3A91EE; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:06:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:06:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Timothy Pearson To: Timothy Pearson Cc: Michael Ellerman , kvm , linuxppc-dev Message-ID: <2099448392.25626899.1679166370571.JavaMail.zimbra@raptorengineeringinc.com> In-Reply-To: <1816556668.17777469.1678390100763.JavaMail.zimbra@raptorengineeringinc.com> References: <8398361.16996856.1678123793664.JavaMail.zimbra@raptorengineeringinc.com> <87bkl2ywz2.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <1816556668.17777469.1678390100763.JavaMail.zimbra@raptorengineeringinc.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.5.0_GA_3042 (ZimbraWebClient - GC111 (Linux)/8.5.0_GA_3042) Thread-Topic: Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems Thread-Index: 5A2fst0q4NGeOTQFqq+CS6XF3WZlK3dFiO0I Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Timothy Pearson" > To: "Michael Ellerman" > Cc: "Timothy Pearson" , "kvm" , "linuxppc-dev" > > Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:28:20 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Michael Ellerman" >> To: "Timothy Pearson" , "kvm" >> >> Cc: "linuxppc-dev" >> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 5:40:01 AM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems > >> Timothy Pearson writes: >>> This patch series reenables VFIO support on POWER systems. It >>> is based on Alexey Kardashevskiys's patch series, rebased and >>> successfully tested under QEMU with a Marvell PCIe SATA controller >>> on a POWER9 Blackbird host. >>> >>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3): >>> powerpc/iommu: Add "borrowing" iommu_table_group_ops >>> powerpc/pci_64: Init pcibios subsys a bit later >>> powerpc/iommu: Add iommu_ops to report capabilities and allow blocking >>> domains >> >> As sent the patches had lost Alexey's authorship (no From: line), I >> fixed it up when applying so the first 3 are authored by Alexey. >> >> cheers > > Thanks for catching that, it wasn't intentional. Probably used a wrong Git > command... Just wanted to touch base on the patches, since they're still listed as Under Review on patchwork. Are we good to go for the 6.4 merge window? Thanks!