From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/8] s390x: Add diag318 intercept test
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:31:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23af5bca-dd2c-43bd-b2b4-6c7e2031517f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24e9883c-22d5-de4f-0001-d271855d7ea3@redhat.com>
On 12/17/20 11:34 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17/12/2020 10.59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17.12.20 10:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 11/12/2020 11.00, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>>> Not much to test except for the privilege and specification
>>>> exceptions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> lib/s390x/sclp.c | 2 ++
>>>> lib/s390x/sclp.h | 6 +++++-
>>>> s390x/intercept.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.c b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
>>>> index cf6ea7c..0001993 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/s390x/sclp.c
>>>> +++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
>>>> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ void sclp_facilities_setup(void)
>>>>
>>>> assert(read_info);
>>>>
>>>> + sclp_facilities.has_diag318 = read_info->byte_134_diag318;
>>>> +
>>>> cpu = (void *)read_info + read_info->offset_cpu;
>>>> for (i = 0; i < read_info->entries_cpu; i++, cpu++) {
>>>> if (cpu->address == cpu0_addr) {
>>>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
>>>> index 6c86037..58f8e54 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
>>>> +++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
>>>> @@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ extern struct sclp_facilities sclp_facilities;
>>>>
>>>> struct sclp_facilities {
>>>> uint64_t has_sief2 : 1;
>>>> - uint64_t : 63;
>>>> + uint64_t has_diag318 : 1;
>>>> + uint64_t : 62;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> typedef struct ReadInfo {
>>>> @@ -130,6 +131,9 @@ typedef struct ReadInfo {
>>>> uint16_t highest_cpu;
>>>> uint8_t _reserved5[124 - 122]; /* 122-123 */
>>>> uint32_t hmfai;
>>>> + uint8_t reserved7[134 - 128];
>>>> + uint8_t byte_134_diag318 : 1;
>>>> + uint8_t : 7;
>>>> struct CPUEntry entries[0];
>>>
>>> ... the entries[] array can be moved around here without any further ado?
>>> Looks confusing to me. Should there be a CPUEntry array here at all, or only
>>> in ReadCpuInfo?
>>
>> there is offset_cpu for the cpu entries at the beginning of the structure.
>
> Ah, thanks, right, this was used earlier in the patch series, now I
> remember. But I think the "struct CPUEntry entries[0]" here is rather
> confusing, since there is no guarantee that the entries are really at this
> location ... I think this line should rather be replaced by a comment saying
> that offset_cpu should be used instead.
Sure, as long as it's clear that there's something at the end, I'm fine
with it.
>
> Thomas
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-17 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-11 10:00 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/8] s390x: Add SIE library and simple test Janosch Frank
2020-12-11 10:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/8] s390x: Add test_bit to library Janosch Frank
2020-12-11 10:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/8] s390x: Consolidate sclp read info Janosch Frank
2020-12-11 12:06 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-17 11:47 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-12-17 14:48 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-11 10:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/8] s390x: SCLP feature checking Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 12:18 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-12-17 15:21 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 15:24 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-11 10:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/8] s390x: Split assembly and move to s390x/asm/ Janosch Frank
2020-12-11 12:18 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-14 10:34 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 12:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-12-17 13:14 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-12-17 15:22 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-11 10:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/8] s390x: sie: Add SIE to lib Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 9:37 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-17 15:45 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 14:42 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-12-11 10:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/8] s390x: sie: Add first SIE test Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 9:41 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-17 14:48 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-12-18 11:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-12-11 10:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/8] s390x: Add diag318 intercept test Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 9:53 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-17 9:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-12-17 10:34 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-17 14:31 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-12-17 15:31 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 15:36 ` Thomas Huth
2020-12-17 14:58 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-12-17 15:25 ` Janosch Frank
2020-12-11 10:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 8/8] s390x: Fix sclp.h style issues Janosch Frank
2020-12-17 14:55 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23af5bca-dd2c-43bd-b2b4-6c7e2031517f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).