From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185C2C433E6 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 19:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF9423125 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726722AbhAFTac (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:30:32 -0500 Received: from mx12.kaspersky-labs.com ([91.103.66.155]:29384 "EHLO mx12.kaspersky-labs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726366AbhAFTac (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:30:32 -0500 Received: from relay12.kaspersky-labs.com (unknown [127.0.0.10]) by relay12.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7595078C48; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 22:29:48 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaspersky.com; s=mail; t=1609961388; bh=uPbj9POde78FdvKvzqkCOR6EdnAvoxjENfLChHuiiPY=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=M5sskh+UWznmJZ7jcWeqPaGVx4xlQ2mvd1ykKwx6Q6uWG9DxHHcl/oAlhNcVdKa3U 8DIDyvdb825x+Lrfq0sG76f4tobjCfufAI60kXSRDp2eluv+3DhEXGGYn5S9e8i8Yh CCpc7W1ljH3eILTQFIoeInjmXkA4PNN00prFMB24= Received: from mail-hq2.kaspersky.com (unknown [91.103.66.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail-hq2.kaspersky.com", Issuer "Kaspersky MailRelays CA G3" (verified OK)) by mailhub12.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3532B78C0E; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 22:29:48 +0300 (MSK) Received: from [10.16.171.77] (10.64.68.128) by hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2044.4; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 22:29:46 +0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] af_vsock: add socket ops for SOCK_SEQPACKET. To: stsp , Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefano Garzarella , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Andra Paraschiv , Jorgen Hansen , Arseniy Krasnov , Colin Ian King , Jeff Vander Stoep CC: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20210103195454.1954169-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> <20210103200421.1956545-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> From: Arseny Krasnov Message-ID: <2420227d-67b5-46df-e10e-e7822253ce94@kaspersky.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 22:29:45 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.64.68.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) To hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) X-KSE-ServerInfo: hqmailmbx3.avp.ru, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-AntiSpam-Version: 5.9.16, Database issued on: 01/06/2021 19:07:02 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Status: KAS_STATUS_NOT_DETECTED X-KSE-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KSE-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Lua profiles 160996 [Jan 06 2021] X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: LuaCore: 419 419 70b0c720f8ddd656e5f4eb4a4449cf8ce400df94 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Version: 5.9.16.0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Envelope from: arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_content_type, plain} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_date, moscow} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_c_tr_enc, eight_bit} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_from_domain_doesnt_match_to} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.com:7.1.1;127.0.0.199:7.1.2;kaspersky.com:7.1.1 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Status: not_detected X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Method: none X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 01/06/2021 19:10:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: Clean, bases: 06.01.2021 15:19:00 X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 52 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2021/01/06 17:58:00 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2021/01/06 15:19:00 #16022888 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org > Is ENODEV the right error here? > Just a quick look at a man page, and > I am under impression something like > EPROTONOSUPPORT or ESOCKNOSUPPORT > may suit? I used ENODEV because this code is returned some lines below when !new_transport(e.g. valid transport not found). But i think you codes will be also ok.