From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C976C432C3 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595F120661 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726323AbfLCI7C (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 03:59:02 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:44666 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725829AbfLCI7C (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 03:59:02 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB38vTcv027577 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 03:59:00 -0500 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wm6g9k1f4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 03:59:00 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:58:58 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:58:56 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xB38wtY659900086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:58:55 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF3E42045; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:58:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FB742041; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:58:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc3016276355.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.222.46]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:58:55 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/9] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt To: Cornelia Huck Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com References: <1574945167-29677-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <1574945167-29677-9-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <20191202155510.410666a0.cohuck@redhat.com> <00d5235b-eaaa-172c-6aa0-09e45be43635@linux.ibm.com> <20191202205443.3711e682.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 09:58:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191202205443.3711e682.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19120308-0028-0000-0000-000003C3F29C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19120308-0029-0000-0000-000024870AF9 Message-Id: <2d071a4e-67e4-66ed-cb60-cf22d1c66b27@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-03_01:2019-11-29,2019-12-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=790 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912030074 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 2019-12-02 20:54, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 19:18:20 +0100 > Pierre Morel wrote: > >> On 2019-12-02 15:55, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:46:06 +0100 >>> Pierre Morel wrote: > >>>> + ccw[0].code = code ; >>> >>> Extra ' ' before ';' >> >> yes, thanks >> >>> >>>> + ccw[0].flags = CCW_F_PCI; >>> >>> Huh, what's that PCI for? >> >> Program Control Interruption > > Yes; but why do you need it? Doesn't the QEMU device provide you with > an interrupt for the final status? I don't think PCI makes sense unless > you want a notification for the progress through a chain. Right, but this is for a later test. So I do not need it. Will remove it. > >> >> I will add a comment :) > > Good idea; the PCI is bound to confuse people :) > >> >>> >>>> + ccw[0].count = count; >>>> + ccw[0].data = (int)(unsigned long)data; >>> >>> Can you be sure that data is always below 2G? >> >> Currently yes, the program is loaded at 0x10000 and is quite small >> also doing a test does not hurt for the case the function is used in >> another test someday. > > Nod. Will do. > >> >>> >>>> + orb_p->intparm = 0xcafec0ca; >>>> + orb_p->ctrl = ORB_F_INIT_IRQ|ORB_F_FORMAT|ORB_F_LPM_DFLT; >>>> + orb_p->cpa = (unsigned int) (unsigned long)&ccw[0]; >>>> + >>>> + report_prefix_push("Start Subchannel"); >>>> + ret = ssch(test_device_sid, orb_p); >>>> + if (ret) { >>>> + report("ssch cc=%d", 0, ret); >>>> + report_prefix_pop(); >>>> + return 0; >>>> + } >>>> + report_prefix_pop(); >>>> + return 1; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static void test_sense(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + int success; >>>> + >>>> + enable_io_irq(); >>>> + >>>> + success = start_subchannel(CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID, buffer, sizeof(senseid)); >>>> + if (!success) { >>>> + report("start_subchannel failed", 0); >>>> + return; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + senseid.cu_type = buffer[2] | (buffer[1] << 8); >>>> + delay(1000); >>>> + >>>> + /* Sense ID is non packed cut_type is at offset +1 byte */ >>>> + if (senseid.cu_type == PONG_CU) >>>> + report("cu_type: expect c0ca, got %04x", 1, senseid.cu_type); >>>> + else >>>> + report("cu_type: expect c0ca, got %04x", 0, senseid.cu_type); >>>> +} >>> >>> I'm not really convinced by that logic here. This will fall apart if >>> you don't have your pong device exactly in the right place, and it does >>> not make it easy to extend this for more devices in the future. >> >> Wanted to keep things simple. PONG must be the first valid channel. >> also, should be documented at least. > > Yes, please :) > Thanks. Regards, Pierre -- Pierre Morel IBM Lab Boeblingen