From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EA8C83007 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18FC206E2 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726519AbgD1Kq5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:46:57 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:61940 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726360AbgD1Kq5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:46:57 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03SAWfWP030704; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:46:54 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mh9nf7nr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:46:54 -0400 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 03SAeVhT069021; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:46:53 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mh9nf7m5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:46:53 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03SAkVhX002074; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:46:51 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30mcu6wy2r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:46:51 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 03SAkmHn17105076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:46:48 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409A342042; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:46:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861924203F; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:46:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from funtu.home (unknown [9.171.3.163]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:46:47 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: store queue struct in hash table for quick access To: Halil Pasic Cc: Tony Krowiak , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com References: <20200407192015.19887-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20200407192015.19887-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20200424055732.7663896d.pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20200427171739.76291a74.pasic@linux.ibm.com> From: Harald Freudenberger Message-ID: <30c824a4-2b3c-984d-406e-1791f7725914@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:46:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200427171739.76291a74.pasic@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-28_06:2020-04-27,2020-04-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004280085 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 27.04.20 17:17, Halil Pasic wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:05:23 +0200 > Harald Freudenberger wrote: > >> On 24.04.20 05:57, Halil Pasic wrote: >>> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:20:01 -0400 >>> Tony Krowiak wrote: >>> >>>> Rather than looping over potentially 65535 objects, let's store the >>>> structures for caching information about queue devices bound to the >>>> vfio_ap device driver in a hash table keyed by APQN. >>> @Harald: >>> Would it make sense to make the efficient lookup of an apqueue base >>> on its APQN core AP functionality instead of each driver figuring it out >>> on it's own? >>> >>> If I'm not wrong the zcrypt device/driver(s) must the problem of >>> looking up a queue based on its APQN as well. >>> >>> For instance struct ep11_cprb has a target_id filed >>> (arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/zcrypt.h). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Halil >> Hi Halil >> >> no, the zcrypt drivers don't have this problem. They build up their own device object which >> includes a pointer to the base ap device. > I'm a bit confused. Doesn't your code loop first trough the ap_card > objects to find the APID portion of the APQN, and then loop the queue > list of the matching card to find the right ap_queue object? Or did I > miss something? Isn't that what _zcrypt_send_ep11_cprb() does? Can you > point me to the code that avoids the lookup (by apqn) for zcrypt? No. The code is looping through zcrypt_card and zcrypt_queue objects which are build up and held by the zcrypt api and the zcrypt driver(s). It does not deal with ap_card and ap_queue devices. > > > If you look at the new function of vfio_ap_get_queue(unsigned long apqn) > it basically about finding the queue based on the apqn, with the > difference that it is vfio specific. > > Regards, > Halil > >> However, this is not a big issue, as the ap_bus holds a list of ap_card objects and within each >> ap_card object there exists a list of ap_queues. > > >