From: Shenming Lu <lushenming@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>,
<yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] vfio: Try to enable IOPF for VFIO devices
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 17:31:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30dcb015-af66-3ae3-f65f-52e3d9f0aaaf@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210129154200.5cc727a0@omen.home.shazbot.org>
On 2021/1/30 6:42, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:04:01 +0800
> Shenming Lu <lushenming@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> If IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF is set for the VFIO device, which means that
>> the delivering of page faults of this device from the IOMMU is enabled,
>> we register the VFIO page fault handler to complete the whole faulting
>> path (HW+SW). And add a iopf_enabled field in struct vfio_device to
>> record it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shenming Lu <lushenming@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> index ff7797260d0f..fd885d99ee0f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
>> struct vfio_group *group;
>> struct list_head group_next;
>> void *device_data;
>> + bool iopf_enabled;
>> };
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
>> @@ -532,6 +533,21 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_get_from_dev(struct device *dev)
>> /**
>> * Device objects - create, release, get, put, search
>> */
>> +
>> +static void vfio_device_enable_iopf(struct vfio_device *device)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = device->dev;
>> +
>> + if (!iommu_dev_has_feature(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(iommu_register_device_fault_handler(dev,
>> + vfio_iommu_dev_fault_handler, dev)))
>
> The layering here is wrong, vfio-core doesn't manage the IOMMU, we have
> backend IOMMU drivers for that. We can't even assume we have IOMMU API
> support here, that's what the type1 backend handles. Thanks,
Thanks for pointing it out, I will correct it: maybe do the enabling via
the VFIO_IOMMU_ENABLE_IOPF ioctl mentioned in the cover and suggest the
user to call it before VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA, also move the iopf_enabled field
from struct vfio_device to struct vfio_iommu...
Thanks,
Shenming
>
> Alex
>
>> + return;
>> +
>> + device->iopf_enabled = true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static
>> struct vfio_device *vfio_group_create_device(struct vfio_group *group,
>> struct device *dev,
>> @@ -549,6 +565,8 @@ struct vfio_device *vfio_group_create_device(struct vfio_group *group,
>> device->group = group;
>> device->ops = ops;
>> device->device_data = device_data;
>> + /* By default try to enable IOPF */
>> + vfio_device_enable_iopf(device);
>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, device);
>>
>> /* No need to get group_lock, caller has group reference */
>> @@ -573,6 +591,8 @@ static void vfio_device_release(struct kref *kref)
>> mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
>>
>> dev_set_drvdata(device->dev, NULL);
>> + if (device->iopf_enabled)
>> + WARN_ON(iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(device->dev));
>>
>> kfree(device);
>>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-30 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-25 9:03 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: Add IOPF support for VFIO passthrough Shenming Lu
2021-01-25 9:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] vfio/type1: Add a bitmap to track IOPF mapped pages Shenming Lu
2021-01-29 22:58 ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-30 9:31 ` Shenming Lu
2021-01-25 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] vfio: Add a page fault handler Shenming Lu
2021-01-27 17:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 6:10 ` Shenming Lu
2021-01-25 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] vfio: Try to enable IOPF for VFIO devices Shenming Lu
2021-01-29 22:42 ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-30 9:31 ` Shenming Lu [this message]
2021-01-25 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] vfio: Allow to pin and map dynamically Shenming Lu
2021-01-29 22:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: Add IOPF support for VFIO passthrough Alex Williamson
2021-01-30 9:30 ` Shenming Lu
2021-02-01 7:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-02-02 6:41 ` Shenming Lu
2021-02-04 6:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-02-05 10:37 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-07 8:20 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-02-07 11:47 ` Shenming Lu
2021-02-09 11:06 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-02-10 8:02 ` Shenming Lu
2021-03-18 7:53 ` Shenming Lu
2021-03-18 9:07 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-03-18 11:53 ` Shenming Lu
2021-03-18 12:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-03-18 12:47 ` Shenming Lu
2021-03-19 0:33 ` Lu Baolu
2021-03-19 1:30 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-03-20 1:35 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30dcb015-af66-3ae3-f65f-52e3d9f0aaaf@huawei.com \
--to=lushenming@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).