kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Set disallowed_nx_huge_page in TDP MMU before setting SPTE
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:49:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <331dc774-c662-9475-1175-725cb2382bb2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvHT0dA0BGgCQ8L+@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com>

On 8/9/22 05:26, Yan Zhao wrote:
> hi Sean,
> 
> I understand this smp_rmb() is intended to prevent the reading of
> p->nx_huge_page_disallowed from happening before it's set to true in
> kvm_tdp_mmu_map(). Is this understanding right?
> 
> If it's true, then do we also need the smp_rmb() for read of sp->gfn in
> handle_removed_pt()? (or maybe for other fields in sp in other places?)

No, in that case the barrier is provided by rcu_dereference().  In fact, 
I am not sure the barriers are needed in this patch either (but the 
comments are :)):

- the write barrier is certainly not needed because it is implicit in 
tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic's cmpxchg64

- the read barrier _should_ also be provided by rcu_dereference(pt), but 
I'm not 100% sure about that. The reasoning is that you have

(1)	iter->old spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
	...
(2)	tdp_ptep_t pt = spte_to_child_pt(old_spte, level);
(3)	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(rcu_dereference(pt));
	...
(4)	if (sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed) {

and (4) is definitely ordered after (1) thanks to the READ_ONCE hidden 
within (3) and the data dependency from old_spte to sp.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-09 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-05 23:05 [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: x86: Apply NX mitigation more precisely Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug the VM if KVM attempts to double count an NX huge page Sean Christopherson
2022-08-14  0:53   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-08-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Tag disallowed NX huge pages even if they're not tracked Sean Christopherson
2022-08-14  0:53   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-08-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename NX huge pages fields/functions for consistency Sean Christopherson
2022-08-14  1:12   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-08-15 21:54     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-16 21:09       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-08-17 16:13         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-18 22:13           ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-08-18 23:45             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 18:30               ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-08-20  1:04                 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-08-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Properly account NX huge page workaround for nonpaging MMUs Sean Christopherson
2022-08-16 21:25   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-08-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Set disallowed_nx_huge_page in TDP MMU before setting SPTE Sean Christopherson
2022-08-09  3:26   ` Yan Zhao
2022-08-09 12:49     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-08-09 14:44       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-09 14:48         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-09 15:05           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Track the number of TDP MMU pages, but not the actual pages Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helper to convert SPTE value to its shadow page Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86/mmu: explicitly check nx_hugepage in disallowed_hugepage_adjust() Sean Christopherson
2022-08-09 12:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-09 14:49     ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=331dc774-c662-9475-1175-725cb2382bb2@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).