From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
"Jason J . Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfio: Follow a strict lifetime for struct iommu_group
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:22:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33bc5258-5c95-99ee-a952-5b0b2826da3a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a0d7937-316a-a0e2-9d7d-df8f3f8a38e3@linux.ibm.com>
On 10/4/22 1:36 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.10.22 um 18:28 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
>> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 05:44:53PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>>> Does some userspace have the group FD open when it stucks like this,
>>>> eg what does fuser say?
>>>
>>> /proc/<virtnodedevd>/fd
>>> 51480 0 dr-x------. 2 root root 0 4. Okt 17:16 .
>>> 43593 0 dr-xr-xr-x. 9 root root 0 4. Okt 17:16 ..
>>> 65252 0 lr-x------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 0 -> /dev/null
>>> 65253 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 1 -> 'socket:[51479]'
>>> 65261 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 10 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
>>> 65262 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 11 -> 'socket:[51485]'
>>> 65263 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 12 -> 'socket:[51487]'
>>> 65264 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 13 -> 'socket:[51486]'
>>> 65265 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 14 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
>>> 65266 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 15 -> 'socket:[60421]'
>>> 65267 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 16 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
>>> 65268 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 17 -> 'socket:[28008]'
>>> 65269 0 l-wx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 18 -> /run/libvirt/nodedev/driver.pid
>>> 65270 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 19 -> 'socket:[28818]'
>>> 65254 0 lrwx------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 2 -> 'socket:[51479]'
>>> 65271 0 lr-x------. 1 root root 64 4. Okt 17:42 20 -> '/dev/vfio/3 (deleted)'
>>
>> Seems like a userspace bug to keep the group FD open after the /dev/
>> file has been deleted :|
>>
>> What do you think about this?
>>
>> commit a54a852b1484b1605917a8f4d80691db333b25ed
>> Author: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
>> Date: Tue Oct 4 13:14:37 2022 -0300
>>
>> vfio: Make the group FD disassociate from the iommu_group
>> Allow the vfio_group struct to exist with a NULL iommu_group pointer. When
>> the pointer is NULL the vfio_group users promise not to touch the
>> iommu_group. This allows a driver to be hot unplugged while userspace is
>> keeping the group FD open.
>> SPAPR mode is excluded from this behavior because of how it wrongly hacks
>> part of its iommu interface through KVM. Due to this we loose control over
>> what it is doing and cannot revoke the iommu_group usage in the IOMMU
>> layer via vfio_group_detach_container().
>> Thus, for SPAPR the group FDs must still be closed before a device can be
>> hot unplugged.
>> This fixes a userspace regression where we learned that virtnodedevd
>> leaves a group FD open even though the /dev/ node for it has been deleted
>> and all the drivers for it unplugged.
>> Fixes: ca5f21b25749 ("vfio: Follow a strict lifetime for struct iommu_group")
>> Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>
> Almost :-)
>
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c: In function 'vfio_file_is_group':
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c:1606:47: error: expected ')' before ';' token
> 1606 | return (file->f_op == &vfio_group_fops;
> | ~ ^
> | )
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c:1606:48: error: expected ';' before '}' token
> 1606 | return (file->f_op == &vfio_group_fops;
> | ^
> | ;
> 1607 | }
> | ~
>
>
> With that fixed I get:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "vfio_file_is_group" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci-core.ko] undefined!
>
> With that worked around (m -> y)
Looks like this can be solved with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_group);
Also:
arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/vfio.c:64:28: warning: ‘kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
64 | static struct iommu_group *kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group looks like it is now SPAPR-only
>
>
> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>
> At least the vfio-ap part
Nope, with this s390 vfio-pci at least breaks:
[ 132.943389] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:53!
[ 132.943406] monitor event: 0040 ilc:2 [#1] SMP
[ 132.943410] Modules linked in: vfio_pci kvm vfio_pci_core irqbypass vfio_virqfd vhost_vsock vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common vsock vhost vhost_iotlb nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defr
ag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables nfnetlink sunrpc mlx5_ib ism smc ib_uverbs ib_core uvdevice s390_trng tape_3590 tape tape_class eadm_sch vfio_ccw mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio zcrypt_cex4 sch_fq_codel configfs ghash_s390 prng chacha_s390 libchacha mlx5_core aes_s390 des_s390 libdes sha3_512_s390 nvme sha3_256_s390 sha512_s390 sh
a256_s390 nvme_core sha1_s390 sha_common zfcp scsi_transport_fc pkey zcrypt rng_core autofs4 [last unloaded: vfio_pci]
[ 132.943457] CPU: 12 PID: 4991 Comm: nose2 Tainted: G W 6.0.0-rc4 #40
[ 132.943460] Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 782 (LPAR)
[ 132.943462] Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 00000000cbc90568 (__list_del_entry_valid+0xd8/0xf0)
[ 132.943469] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
[ 132.943474] Krnl GPRS: 8000000000000001 0000000900000027 000000000000004e 00000000ccc1ffe0
[ 132.943477] 00000000fffeffff 00000009fc290000 0000000000000000 0000000000000080
[ 132.943480] 00000000acc86438 0000000000000000 00000000acc86420 00000000a1492800
[ 132.943483] 00000000922a0000 000003ffb9dce260 00000000cbc90564 0000038004a6b9f8
[ 132.943489] Krnl Code: 00000000cbc90558: c0200045eff3 larl %r2,00000000cc54e53e
[ 132.943489] 00000000cbc9055e: c0e50022c7d9 brasl %r14,00000000cc0e9510
[ 132.943489] #00000000cbc90564: af000000 mc 0,0
[ 132.943489] >00000000cbc90568: b9040032 lgr %r3,%r2
[ 132.943489] 00000000cbc9056c: c0200045efd4 larl %r2,00000000cc54e514
[ 132.943489] 00000000cbc90572: c0e50022c7cf brasl %r14,00000000cc0e9510
[ 132.943489] 00000000cbc90578: af000000 mc 0,0
[ 132.943489] 00000000cbc9057c: 0707 bcr 0,%r7
[ 132.943510] Call Trace:
[ 132.943512] [<00000000cbc90568>] __list_del_entry_valid+0xd8/0xf0
[ 132.943515] ([<00000000cbc90564>] __list_del_entry_valid+0xd4/0xf0)
[ 132.943518] [<000003ff8011a1b8>] vfio_group_detach_container+0x88/0x170 [vfio]
[ 132.943524] [<000003ff801176c0>] vfio_device_remove_group.isra.0+0xb0/0x1e0 [vfio]
[ 132.943529] [<000003ff804f9e54>] vfio_pci_core_unregister_device+0x34/0x80 [vfio_pci_core]
[ 132.943535] [<000003ff804ae1c4>] vfio_pci_remove+0x2c/0x40 [vfio_pci]
[ 132.943539] [<00000000cbd58c3c>] pci_device_remove+0x3c/0x98
[ 132.943542] [<00000000cbdbdbce>] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c6/0x288
[ 132.943545] [<00000000cbd4e284>] pci_stop_bus_device+0x94/0xc0
[ 132.943549] [<00000000cbd4e570>] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked+0x30/0x48
[ 132.943552] [<00000000cb55d980>] zpci_bus_remove_device+0x68/0xa8
[ 132.943555] [<00000000cb556e82>] zpci_deconfigure_device+0x3a/0xe0
[ 132.943558] [<00000000cbd65d04>] power_write_file+0x7c/0x130
[ 132.943561] [<00000000cb8fbc90>] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x210
[ 132.943565] [<00000000cb837344>] vfs_write+0x194/0x2e0 "
[ 132.943568] [<00000000cb8376fa>] ksys_write+0x6a/0xf8
[ 132.943571] [<00000000cc0f918c>] __do_syscall+0x1d4/0x200
[ 132.943575] [<00000000cc107e42>] system_call+0x82/0xb0
[ 132.943577] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
[ 132.943579] [<00000000cc0e955c>] _printk+0x4c/0x58
[ 132.943585] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-04 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-23 0:06 [PATCH v2] vfio: Follow a strict lifetime for struct iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-26 17:03 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-09-27 20:05 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-04 15:19 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-04 15:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-04 15:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-04 16:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-04 17:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-04 17:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-04 17:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-04 17:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-04 18:22 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2022-10-04 18:56 ` Eric Farman
2022-10-05 13:46 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-05 13:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-05 14:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-05 14:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-05 14:19 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-06 11:55 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-05 14:21 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-05 15:40 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-05 14:01 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-04 19:59 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-04 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-04 22:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-27 6:34 ` Yi Liu
2022-09-27 13:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-28 3:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-09-28 15:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-28 23:54 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33bc5258-5c95-99ee-a952-5b0b2826da3a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).