kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@amazon.de>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.de>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:41:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cd533c1-3f18-a84f-fbb2-264751ed3eeb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A542C98B-486C-4849-9DAC-2355F0F89A20@amacapital.net>

On 6/12/19 1:27 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> We've discussed having per-cpu page tables where a given PGD is
>> only in use from one CPU at a time.  I *think* this scheme still
>> works in such a case, it just adds one more PGD entry that would
>> have to context-switched.
> Fair warning: Linus is on record as absolutely hating this idea. He
> might change his mind, but it’s an uphill battle.

Just to be clear, are you referring to the per-cpu PGDs, or to this
patch set with a per-mm kernel area?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-12 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-12 17:08 [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 01/10] x86/mm/kaslr: refactor to use enum indices for regions Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 02/10] x86/speculation, mm: add process local virtual memory region Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 03/10] x86/mm, mm,kernel: add teardown for process-local memory to mm cleanup Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 04/10] mm: allocate virtual space for process-local memory Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 05/10] mm: allocate/release physical pages " Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 06/10] kvm/x86: add support for storing vCPU state in " Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 07/10] kvm, vmx: move CR2 context switch out of assembly path Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 08/10] kvm, vmx: move register clearing " Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 09/10] kvm, vmx: move gprs to process local memory Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC 10/10] kvm, x86: move guest FPU state into " Marius Hillenbrand
2019-06-12 18:25 ` [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets Sean Christopherson
2019-06-13  7:20   ` Alexander Graf
2019-06-13 10:54   ` Liran Alon
2019-06-12 19:55 ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-12 20:27   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-12 20:41     ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2019-06-12 20:56       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-13  1:30     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-13  1:50       ` Nadav Amit
2019-06-13 16:16         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-13  7:52       ` Alexander Graf
2019-06-13 16:13         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-13 16:20           ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-13 17:29             ` Nadav Amit
2019-06-13 17:49               ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-13 20:05                 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-14 14:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-16 22:18       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-16 22:28         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-17  7:38       ` Alexander Graf
2019-06-17 15:50         ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-17 15:54           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-17 16:03             ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-17 16:14               ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-17 16:53                 ` Nadav Amit
2019-06-17 18:07                   ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-17 18:45                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-17 18:49                       ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-17 18:53                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-17 18:50                     ` Nadav Amit
2019-06-17 18:55                       ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-13  7:27   ` Alexander Graf
2019-06-13 14:19     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3cd533c1-3f18-a84f-fbb2-264751ed3eeb@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=graf@amazon.de \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhillenb@amazon.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).