From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Radim K <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/16] RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.1 support
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:26:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41bcc34d-7752-04e7-077b-9a3851f66189@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190729115544.17895-16-anup.patel@wdc.com>
On 29/07/19 13:57, Anup Patel wrote:
> From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
>
> The KVM host kernel running in HS-mode needs to handle SBI calls coming
> from guest kernel running in VS-mode.
>
> This patch adds SBI v0.1 support in KVM RISC-V. All the SBI calls are
> implemented correctly except remote tlb flushes. For remote TLB flushes,
> we are doing full TLB flush and this will be optimized in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
> arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_exit.c | 3 +
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 1bb4befa89da..22a62ffc09f5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -227,4 +227,6 @@ void kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_on(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_riscv_halt_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_riscv_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_ecall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +
> #endif /* __RISCV_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> index 3e0c7558320d..b56dc1650d2c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ ccflags-y := -Ivirt/kvm -Iarch/riscv/kvm
> kvm-objs := $(common-objs-y)
>
> kvm-objs += main.o vm.o vmid.o tlb.o mmu.o
> -kvm-objs += vcpu.o vcpu_exit.o vcpu_switch.o vcpu_timer.o
> +kvm-objs += vcpu.o vcpu_exit.o vcpu_switch.o vcpu_timer.o vcpu_sbi.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += kvm.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_exit.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_exit.c
> index 2d09640c98b2..003e43facdfc 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_exit.c
> @@ -531,6 +531,9 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> (vcpu->arch.guest_context.hstatus & HSTATUS_STL))
> ret = stage2_page_fault(vcpu, run, scause, stval);
> break;
> + case EXC_SUPERVISOR_SYSCALL:
> + if (vcpu->arch.guest_context.hstatus & HSTATUS_SPV)
> + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_ecall(vcpu);
> default:
> break;
> };
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8dfdbf744378
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/**
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <asm/csr.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> +
> +#define SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 0
> +#define SBI_VERSION_MINOR 1
> +
> +static unsigned long kvm_sbi_unpriv_load(const unsigned long *addr,
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags, val;
> + unsigned long __hstatus, __sstatus;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + __hstatus = csr_read(CSR_HSTATUS);
> + __sstatus = csr_read(CSR_SSTATUS);
> + csr_write(CSR_HSTATUS, vcpu->arch.guest_context.hstatus | HSTATUS_SPRV);
> + csr_write(CSR_SSTATUS, vcpu->arch.guest_context.sstatus);
> + val = *addr;
> + csr_write(CSR_HSTATUS, __hstatus);
> + csr_write(CSR_SSTATUS, __sstatus);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_sbi_system_shutdown(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 type)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
> +
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm)
> + tmp->arch.power_off = true;
> + kvm_make_all_cpus_request(vcpu->kvm, KVM_REQ_SLEEP);
> +
> + memset(&vcpu->run->system_event, 0, sizeof(vcpu->run->system_event));
> + vcpu->run->system_event.type = type;
> + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_ecall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + int ret = 1;
> + u64 next_cycle;
> + int vcpuid;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *remote_vcpu;
> + ulong dhart_mask;
> + struct kvm_cpu_context *cp = &vcpu->arch.guest_context;
> +
> + if (!cp)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + switch (cp->a7) {
> + case SBI_SET_TIMER:
> +#if __riscv_xlen == 32
> + next_cycle = ((u64)cp->a1 << 32) | (u64)cp->a0;
> +#else
> + next_cycle = (u64)cp->a0;
> +#endif
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_next_event(vcpu, next_cycle);
> + break;
> + case SBI_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR:
> + /* Not implemented */
> + cp->a0 = -ENOTSUPP;
> + break;
> + case SBI_CONSOLE_GETCHAR:
> + /* Not implemented */
> + cp->a0 = -ENOTSUPP;
> + break;
Would it make sense to send these two down to userspace?
Paolo
> + case SBI_CLEAR_IPI:
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_unset_interrupt(vcpu, IRQ_S_SOFT);
> + break;
> + case SBI_SEND_IPI:
> + dhart_mask = kvm_sbi_unpriv_load((unsigned long *)cp->a0, vcpu);
> + for_each_set_bit(vcpuid, &dhart_mask, BITS_PER_LONG) {
> + remote_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(vcpu->kvm, vcpuid);
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_interrupt(remote_vcpu, IRQ_S_SOFT);
> + }
> + break;
> + case SBI_SHUTDOWN:
> + kvm_sbi_system_shutdown(vcpu, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN);
> + ret = 0;
> + break;
> + case SBI_REMOTE_FENCE_I:
> + sbi_remote_fence_i(NULL);
> + break;
> +
> + /*TODO:There should be a way to call remote hfence.bvma.
> + * Preferred method is now a SBI call. Until then, just flush
> + * all tlbs.
> + */
> + case SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA:
> + /*TODO: Parse vma range.*/
> + sbi_remote_sfence_vma(NULL, 0, 0);
> + break;
> + case SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID:
> + /*TODO: Parse vma range for given ASID */
> + sbi_remote_sfence_vma(NULL, 0, 0);
> + break;
> + default:
> + cp->a0 = ENOTSUPP;
> + break;
> + };
> +
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + cp->sepc += 4;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-30 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-29 11:56 [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM RISC-V Support Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:56 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] KVM: RISC-V: Add KVM_REG_RISCV for ONE_REG interface Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:56 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] RISC-V: Add hypervisor extension related CSR defines Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:56 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] RISC-V: Add initial skeletal KVM support Anup Patel
2019-07-30 9:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 11:04 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 11:03 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:56 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement VCPU create, init and destroy functions Anup Patel
2019-07-30 8:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 10:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 11:45 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 11:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-29 11:56 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement VCPU interrupts and requests handling Anup Patel
2019-07-30 11:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 12:00 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 12:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 12:45 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 13:35 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 14:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-02 3:59 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:56 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctls Anup Patel
2019-07-30 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 9:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 12:08 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 12:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 12:16 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement VCPU world-switch Anup Patel
2019-07-30 9:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 12:51 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] RISC-V: KVM: Handle MMIO exits for VCPU Anup Patel
2019-07-30 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-31 7:23 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] RISC-V: KVM: Handle WFI " Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement VMID allocator Anup Patel
2019-07-30 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement stage2 page table programming Anup Patel
2019-07-30 9:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 12:14 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement MMU notifiers Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] RISC-V: KVM: Add timer functionality Anup Patel
2019-07-29 14:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2019-07-29 18:02 ` Atish Patra
2019-07-30 6:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2019-07-30 7:00 ` Atish Patra
2019-07-30 11:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-31 1:55 ` Atish Patra
2019-07-31 6:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-31 7:18 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] RISC-V: KVM: FP lazy save/restore Anup Patel
2019-07-29 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.1 support Anup Patel
2019-07-29 19:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-29 19:51 ` Atish Patra
2019-07-29 20:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-29 21:08 ` Atish Patra
2019-07-30 9:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-07-29 11:58 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] RISC-V: Enable VIRTIO drivers in RV64 and RV32 defconfig Anup Patel
2019-07-29 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM RISC-V Support Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 5:26 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 13:50 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 14:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 6:53 ` Andreas Schwab
2019-07-30 7:25 ` Anup Patel
2019-07-30 7:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2019-07-30 7:36 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41bcc34d-7752-04e7-077b-9a3851f66189@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
--cc=Anup.Patel@wdc.com \
--cc=Atish.Patra@wdc.com \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).