Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] nSVM: Test host RFLAGS.TF on VMRUN

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 23/03/21 18:50, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
> v4 -> v5:
>          1. The fix in patch# 1 has been modified. We are queue'ing the
>             pending #DB intercept via nested_svm_vmexit() if the VMRUN is
>             found to be single-stepped.
>          2. In patch# 3, the assembly label for tracking the VMRUN RIP has
>             been changed to u64* from void*.
> 
> [PATCH 1/4 v5] KVM: nSVM: If VMRUN is single-stepped, queue the #DB
> [PATCH 2/4 v5] KVM: X86: Add a utility function to read current RIP
> [PATCH 3/4 v5] KVM: nSVM: Add assembly label to VMRUN instruction
> [PATCH 4/4 v5] nSVM: Test effect of host RFLAGS.TF on VMRUN
> 
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 10 ++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> Krish Sadhukhan (1):
>        KVM: nSVM: If VMRUN is single-stepped, queue the #DB intercept in nested_svm_vmexit()
> 
>   lib/x86/processor.h |   7 ++++
>   x86/svm.c           |  16 ++++++--
>   x86/svm_tests.c     | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Krish Sadhukhan (3):
>        KVM: X86: Add a utility function to read current RIP
>        KVM: nSVM: Add assembly label to VMRUN instruction
>        nSVM: Test effect of host RFLAGS.TF on VMRUN
> 

Queued 1-3-4, 2 is not needed.

Paolo