From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: nVMX: get rid of nested_get_page()
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 21:42:18 +0200
Message-ID: <477dc99d-11d8-9d4c-45ca-c6dedd40ddd4@redhat.com>
References: <20170803140907.23681-1-david@redhat.com>
 <20170803140907.23681-2-david@redhat.com>
 <20170803184000.GA9237@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51888 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751251AbdHCTmV (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:42:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170803184000.GA9237@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 03.08.2017 20:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:09:06PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> nested_get_page() just sounds confusing. All we want is a page from G1.
> 
> What is G1? Is that the same thing as L1? Or do you mean L2?
> 

L1 == Level 1
G1 == Guest 1 == Level 1

(valid question, I am used to the GX terminology (we used on s390x). L1
seems to be used in the context of VMX, so I'll try to use it for VMX in
the future)

-- 

Thanks,

David