From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:43:54 +0300 Message-ID: <49D488DA.8060005@redhat.com> References: <20090402085253.GA29932@gondor.apana.org.au> <49D47F11.6070400@redhat.com> <20090402091639.GA30126@gondor.apana.org.au> <49D484F5.2000400@redhat.com> <20090402092936.GA30333@gondor.apana.org.au> <49D487A6.407@redhat.com> <20090402094147.GA30586@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ghaskins@novell.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, pmullaney@novell.com, pmorreale@novell.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090402094147.GA30586@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:38:46PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Why does a kernel solution not need to know when a packet is transmitted? >> > > Because you can install your own destructor? > So we're back to "the problem is with the kernel->user interface, not userspace being cursed into slowness". -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function