Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
>   
>
>>  there will *never* be another packet in the queue
>> at this point, since it wasn't running.
>>   
>>     
> Yep, and I'll be the first to admit that my design only looks forward. 
>   
To clarify, I am referring to the internal design of the venet-tap
only.  The general vbus architecture makes no such policy decisions.

-Greg