From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@arm.com>
Cc: julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, eric.auger@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/pci: Add support for PCIe extended capabilities
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:27:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f5307cf-0cea-461a-838f-85e82805c499@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210831145424.GA32001@willie-the-truck>
On 8/31/21 3:54 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Will,
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:55:14AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Add support to parse extended configuration space for vfio based
>> assigned PCIe devices and add extended capabilities for the device
>> in the guest. This allows the guest to see and work on extended
>> capabilities, for example to toggle PRI extended cap to enable and
>> disable Shared virtual addressing (SVA) support.
>> PCIe extended capability header that is the first DWORD of all
>> extended caps is shown below -
>>
>> 31 20 19 16 15 0
>> ____________________|_______|_____________________
>> | Next cap off | 1h | Cap ID |
>> |____________________|_______|_____________________|
>>
>> Out of the two upper bytes of extended cap header, the
>> lower nibble is actually cap version - 0x1.
>> 'next cap offset' if present at bits [31:20], should be
>> right shifted by 4 bits to calculate the position of next
>> capability.
>> This change supports parsing and adding ATS, PRI and PASID caps.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@arm.com>
>> ---
>> include/kvm/pci.h | 6 +++
>> vfio/pci.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Does this work correctly for architectures which don't define ARCH_HAS_PCI_EXP?
I think it does: the code compiles fine, and the whole functionality is
guarded by:
+ /* Extended cap only for PCIe devices */
+ if (!arch_has_pci_exp())
+ return 0;
A clever compiler might even decide to not include this code at all.
Did you see any particular problem?
Cheers,
Andre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-01 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-10 6:25 [PATCH] vfio/pci: Add support for PCIe extended capabilities Vivek Gautam
2021-08-31 14:54 ` Will Deacon
2021-09-01 10:27 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2021-09-01 10:44 ` Will Deacon
2021-09-02 10:28 ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-08-31 17:14 ` Andre Przywara
2021-09-02 10:42 ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-09-02 9:59 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-02 10:48 ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-09-03 15:15 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-08 9:32 ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-09-08 9:36 ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-09-08 16:20 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-08 16:18 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-04 9:47 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f5307cf-0cea-461a-838f-85e82805c499@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=vivek.gautam@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).