kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@arm.com>
Cc: julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	jean-philippe@linaro.org, eric.auger@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/pci: Add support for PCIe extended capabilities
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:27:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f5307cf-0cea-461a-838f-85e82805c499@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210831145424.GA32001@willie-the-truck>

On 8/31/21 3:54 PM, Will Deacon wrote:

Hi Will,

> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:55:14AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Add support to parse extended configuration space for vfio based
>> assigned PCIe devices and add extended capabilities for the device
>> in the guest. This allows the guest to see and work on extended
>> capabilities, for example to toggle PRI extended cap to enable and
>> disable Shared virtual addressing (SVA) support.
>> PCIe extended capability header that is the first DWORD of all
>> extended caps is shown below -
>>
>>     31               20  19   16  15                 0
>>     ____________________|_______|_____________________
>>    |    Next cap off    |  1h   |     Cap ID          |
>>    |____________________|_______|_____________________|
>>
>> Out of the two upper bytes of extended cap header, the
>> lower nibble is actually cap version - 0x1.
>> 'next cap offset' if present at bits [31:20], should be
>> right shifted by 4 bits to calculate the position of next
>> capability.
>> This change supports parsing and adding ATS, PRI and PASID caps.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   include/kvm/pci.h |   6 +++
>>   vfio/pci.c        | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Does this work correctly for architectures which don't define ARCH_HAS_PCI_EXP?

I think it does: the code compiles fine, and the whole functionality is 
guarded by:
+	/* Extended cap only for PCIe devices */
+	if (!arch_has_pci_exp())
+		return 0;

A clever compiler might even decide to not include this code at all.

Did you see any particular problem?

Cheers,
Andre

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-01 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-10  6:25 [PATCH] vfio/pci: Add support for PCIe extended capabilities Vivek Gautam
2021-08-31 14:54 ` Will Deacon
2021-09-01 10:27   ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2021-09-01 10:44     ` Will Deacon
2021-09-02 10:28       ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-08-31 17:14 ` Andre Przywara
2021-09-02 10:42   ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-09-02  9:59 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-02 10:48   ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-09-03 15:15     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-08  9:32       ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-09-08  9:36         ` Vivek Kumar Gautam
2021-09-08 16:20           ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-08 16:18         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-04  9:47         ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f5307cf-0cea-461a-838f-85e82805c499@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).