kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: pending exceptions must not be blocked by an injected event
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 19:05:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f6a321a-bc44-fe2f-37f5-6b22bc7fae1c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401143817.1030695-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

On 01/04/21 16:38, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Injected interrupts/nmi should not block a pending exception,
> but rather be either lost if nested hypervisor doesn't
> intercept the pending exception (as in stock x86), or be delivered
> in exitintinfo/IDT_VECTORING_INFO field, as a part of a VMexit
> that corresponds to the pending exception.
> 
> The only reason for an exception to be blocked is when nested run
> is pending (and that can't really happen currently
> but still worth checking for).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

This patch would be an almost separate bugfix, right?  I am going to 
queue this, but a confirmation would be helpful.

Paolo

> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c |  8 +++++++-
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 10 ++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> index 8523f60adb92..34a37b2bd486 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,13 @@ static int svm_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending) {
> -		if (block_nested_events)
> +		/*
> +		 * Only a pending nested run can block a pending exception.
> +		 * Otherwise an injected NMI/interrupt should either be
> +		 * lost or delivered to the nested hypervisor in the EXITINTINFO
> +		 * vmcb field, while delivering the pending exception.
> +		 */
> +		if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
>                           return -EBUSY;
>   		if (!nested_exit_on_exception(svm))
>   			return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index fd334e4aa6db..c3ba842fc07f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -3806,9 +3806,15 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Process any exceptions that are not debug traps before MTF.
> +	 *
> +	 * Note that only a pending nested run can block a pending exception.
> +	 * Otherwise an injected NMI/interrupt should either be
> +	 * lost or delivered to the nested hypervisor in the IDT_VECTORING_INFO,
> +	 * while delivering the pending exception.
>   	 */
> +
>   	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending && !vmx_pending_dbg_trap(vcpu)) {
> -		if (block_nested_events)
> +		if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending)
>   			return -EBUSY;
>   		if (!nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual))
>   			goto no_vmexit;
> @@ -3825,7 +3831,7 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending) {
> -		if (block_nested_events)
> +		if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending)
>   			return -EBUSY;
>   		if (!nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual))
>   			goto no_vmexit;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01 14:38 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nSVM/nVMX: fix nested virtualization treatment of nested exceptions Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: pending exceptions must not be blocked by an injected event Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 17:05   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-04-01 17:12     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: separate pending and injected exception Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 23:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-02  7:14     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-02 15:01       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: correctly merge " Maxim Levitsky
2021-04-01 19:56   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 22:56     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 14:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: remove tweaking of inject_page_fault Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f6a321a-bc44-fe2f-37f5-6b22bc7fae1c@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).