From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow zapping collapsible SPTEs to use MMU read lock
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:12:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51034a41-2d03-103e-6c11-1ed27a952de2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210331210841.3996155-11-bgardon@google.com>
On 31/03/21 23:08, Ben Gardon wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index dcbfc784cf2f..81967b4e7d76 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5610,10 +5610,13 @@ void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
>
> write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> slot_handle_leaf(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte, true);
> -
> - if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
> - kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(kvm, slot);
> write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> + if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm)) {
> + read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(kvm, memslot);
> + read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + }
> }
Same here, this will conflict with
KVM: x86/mmu: Coalesce TLB flushes when zapping collapsible SPTEs
Again, you will have to add back some "if (flush)" before the write_unlock.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-01 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-31 21:08 [PATCH 00/13] More parallel operations for the TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Re-add const qualifier in kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Move kvm_mmu_(get|put)_root to TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: x86/mmu: use tdp_mmu_free_sp to free roots Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Merge TDP MMU put and free root Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: x86/mmu: comment for_each_tdp_mmu_root requires MMU write lock Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor yield safe root iterator Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 07/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Make TDP MMU root refcount atomic Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 22:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 16:50 ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 08/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect the tdp_mmu_roots list with RCU Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 16:48 ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 13:16 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-01 16:50 ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow zap gfn range to operate under the mmu read lock Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 9:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 16:50 ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow zapping collapsible SPTEs to use MMU " Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 10:12 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow enabling / disabling dirty logging under " Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Fast invalidation for TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 22:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 16:50 ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 10:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 16:50 ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 17:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Tear down roots in fast invalidation thread Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 22:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 10:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 10:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 10:43 ` [PATCH 00/13] More parallel operations for the TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51034a41-2d03-103e-6c11-1ed27a952de2@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).