From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS5250: Register architected timers Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 13:45:39 +0200 Message-ID: <515AC4E3.2070508@suse.de> References: <1363222742-15220-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1363222742-15220-4-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <239701ce2f8f$093a2f40$1bae8dc0$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, =?EUC-KR?B?IlRIT01BUyBQIEFCUkFIQU0vU1JJLUJhbmdhbG9yZS1TTEcvLi+777y6wPzA2g==?= =?EUC-KR?B?Ig==?= , 'Giridhar BM' To: Kukjin Kim Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38134 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761221Ab3DBLpm (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 07:45:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <239701ce2f8f$093a2f40$1bae8dc0$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/02/2013 12:44 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Alexander Graf wrote: >> When running on an exynos 5250 SoC, we don't initialize the architected >> timers. The chip however supports architected timers. >> > Yes, exynos5250 can support, mct(multi core timer) is used though. > >> When we don't initialize them, KVM will try to access them and run into >> NULL pointer dereferences attempting to do so. >> > Yes, right. > >> This patch is really more of a hack than a real fix, but does get me >> working with KVM on Arndale. >> > Hmm, if you think, this is _really_ a hack, you need to add some comments > about that for clearance, and since the mct.c file has been moved into > drivers/clocksource/, this should be re-worked. > > BTW, I discussed about this with Thomas and Giridhar just now, we reached > this 3rd patch could be dropped because the correct way is to add a dts > node for arch timer which patch 2nd is already doing after 3.9-rc1 because > of CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE macro. > > So if you' OK above, let me know so that I can take only 1st and 2nd > patches to support KVM on exynos5250. I'd say go ahead and take them and I'll verify whether things work on your tree :). What's the git repo of your branch? Alex