From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"Christoffer Dall" <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
"Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Cache successful MSI->LPI translation
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:50:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53de88e9-3550-bd7f-8266-35c5e75fae4e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611170336.121706-8-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
On 2019/6/12 1:03, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On a successful translation, preserve the parameters in the LPI
> translation cache. Each translation is reusing the last slot
> in the list, naturally evincting the least recently used entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 0aa0cbbc3af6..62932458476a 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,90 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_its_idregs(struct kvm *kvm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct vgic_irq *__vgic_its_check_cache(struct vgic_dist *dist,
> + phys_addr_t db,
> + u32 devid, u32 eventid)
> +{
> + struct vgic_translation_cache_entry *cte;
> + struct vgic_irq *irq = NULL;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(cte, &dist->lpi_translation_cache, entry) {
> + /*
> + * If we hit a NULL entry, there is nothing after this
> + * point.
> + */
> + if (!cte->irq)
> + break;
> +
> + if (cte->db == db &&
> + cte->devid == devid &&
> + cte->eventid == eventid) {
> + /*
> + * Move this entry to the head, as it is the
> + * most recently used.
> + */
> + list_move(&cte->entry, &dist->lpi_translation_cache);
Only for performance reasons: if we hit at the "head" of the list, we
don't need to do a list_move().
In our tests, we found that a single list_move() takes nearly (sometimes
even more than) one microsecond, for some unknown reason...
Thanks,
zenghui
> + irq = cte->irq;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return irq;
> +}
> +
> +static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
> + u32 devid, u32 eventid,
> + struct vgic_irq *irq)
> +{
> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> + struct vgic_translation_cache_entry *cte;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + phys_addr_t db;
> +
> + /* Do not cache a directly injected interrupt */
> + if (irq->hw)
> + return;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
> +
> + if (unlikely(list_empty(&dist->lpi_translation_cache)))
> + goto out;
> +
> + /*
> + * We could have raced with another CPU caching the same
> + * translation behind our back, so let's check it is not in
> + * already
> + */
> + db = its->vgic_its_base + GITS_TRANSLATER;
> + if (__vgic_its_check_cache(dist, db, devid, eventid))
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* Always reuse the last entry (LRU policy) */
> + cte = list_last_entry(&dist->lpi_translation_cache,
> + typeof(*cte), entry);
> +
> + /*
> + * Caching the translation implies having an extra reference
> + * to the interrupt, so drop the potential reference on what
> + * was in the cache, and increment it on the new interrupt.
> + */
> + if (cte->irq)
> + __vgic_put_lpi_locked(kvm, cte->irq);
> +
> + vgic_get_irq_kref(irq);
> +
> + cte->db = db;
> + cte->devid = devid;
> + cte->eventid = eventid;
> + cte->irq = irq;
> +
> + /* Move the new translation to the head of the list */
> + list_move(&cte->entry, &dist->lpi_translation_cache);
> +
> +out:
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> void vgic_its_invalidate_cache(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> @@ -589,6 +673,8 @@ int vgic_its_resolve_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
> if (!vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.lpis_enabled)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> + vgic_its_cache_translation(kvm, its, devid, eventid, ite->irq);
> +
> *irq = ite->irq;
> return 0;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 17:03 [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: ITS translation cache Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add LPI translation cache definition Marc Zyngier
2019-06-12 8:16 ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12 8:49 ` Julien Thierry
[not found] ` <86ef3zgmg6.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2019-06-12 10:58 ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12 12:28 ` Julien Thierry
2019-07-23 12:43 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add __vgic_put_lpi_locked primitive Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Add MSI-LPI translation cache invalidation Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:39 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on specific commands Marc Zyngier
2019-07-01 12:38 ` Auger Eric
2019-07-22 10:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:25 ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:47 ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on disabling LPIs Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:09 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on vgic teardown Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:10 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Cache successful MSI->LPI translation Marc Zyngier
2019-06-25 11:50 ` Zenghui Yu [this message]
2019-06-25 12:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-25 16:00 ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-26 3:54 ` Zenghui Yu
2019-07-23 15:21 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check the LPI translation cache on MSI injection Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:10 ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-24 7:41 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-irqfd: Implement kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:14 ` Auger Eric
2019-07-25 8:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: ITS translation cache Andre Przywara
2019-07-25 8:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25 10:01 ` Andre Przywara
2019-07-25 15:37 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53de88e9-3550-bd7f-8266-35c5e75fae4e@huawei.com \
--to=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).