From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 51/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Add doorbell interrupt
 handling
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:06:29 +0800
Message-ID: <59AFBA95.6070508@huawei.com>
References: <20170731172637.29355-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20170731172637.29355-52-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:5980 "EHLO
        szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752463AbdIFJG4 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 6 Sep 2017 05:06:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170731172637.29355-52-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 2017/8/1 1:26, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When a vPE is not running, a VLPI being made pending results in a
> doorbell interrupt being delivered. Let's handle this interrupt
> and update the pending_last flag that indicates that VLPIs are
> pending. The corresponding vcpu is also kicked into action.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> index 534d3051a078..6af3cde6d7d4 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@
>  
>  #include "vgic.h"
>  
> +static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = info;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(vcpu)) {
> +		vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.pending_last = true;
> +		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, vcpu);
> +		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> +	}
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
>  int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> @@ -57,16 +70,37 @@ int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		int irq = dist->its_vm.vpes[i]->irq;
> +
> +		ret = request_irq(irq, vgic_v4_doorbell_handler,
> +				  0, "vcpu", vcpu);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			kvm_err("failed to allocate vcpu IRQ%d\n", irq);
> +			dist->its_vm.nr_vpes = i;
This overwirtes the nr_vpes while it uses kvm->online_vcpus in
its_alloc_vcpu_irqs to alloc irqs and if this fails it uses the
overwirten nr_vpes other than kvm->online_vcpus in its_free_vcpu_irqs to
free the irqs. So there will be memory leak on error path.

> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		vgic_v4_teardown(kvm);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	struct its_vm *its_vm = &kvm->arch.vgic.its_vm;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	if (!its_vm->vpes)
>  		return;
>  
> +	for (i = 0; i < its_vm->nr_vpes; i++) {
> +		struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, i);
> +		free_irq(its_vm->vpes[i]->irq, vcpu);
> +	}
> +
>  	its_free_vcpu_irqs(its_vm);
>  	kfree(its_vm->vpes);
>  	its_vm->nr_vpes = 0;
> 

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon