From: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
To: Christophe de Dinechin <christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests Patch v1 2/2] x86: ioapic: Test physical and logical destination mode
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:28:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fac8c7b-ddcd-de22-568d-bc7ab6c7c71f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7hblsw8fji.fsf@crazypad.dinechin.lan>
On 11/28/19 5:25 AM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> Nitesh Narayan Lal writes:
>
>> This patch tests the physical destination mode by sending an
>> interrupt to one of the vcpus and logical destination mode by
>> sending an interrupt to more than one vcpus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> x86/ioapic.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/x86/ioapic.c b/x86/ioapic.c
>> index c32dabd..31aec03 100644
>> --- a/x86/ioapic.c
>> +++ b/x86/ioapic.c
>> @@ -405,12 +405,73 @@ static void test_ioapic_self_reconfigure(void)
>> report("Reconfigure self", g_isr_84 == 1 && e.remote_irr == 0);
>> }
>>
>> +static volatile int g_isr_85;
>> +
>> +static void ioapic_isr_85(isr_regs_t *regs)
>> +{
>> + ++g_isr_85;
>> + set_irq_line(0x0e, 0);
>> + eoi();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode(void)
>> +{
>> + ioapic_redir_entry_t e = {
>> + .vector = 0x85,
>> + .delivery_mode = 0,
>> + .dest_mode = 0,
>> + .dest_id = 0x1,
>> + .trig_mode = TRIGGER_LEVEL,
>> + };
>> + handle_irq(0x85, ioapic_isr_85);
>> + ioapic_write_redir(0xe, e);
>> + set_irq_line(0x0e, 1);
>> + do {
>> + pause();
>> + } while(g_isr_85 != 1);
> Does this loop (and the next one) end up running forever if the test
> fails? Would it be worth adding some timeout to detect failure?
AFAIK there is already a timeout in place. i.e., if we don't receive an
interrupt then eventually the timeout will occur and the test will terminate.
>
>> + report("ioapic physical destination mode", g_isr_85 == 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static volatile int g_isr_86;
>> +
>> +static void ioapic_isr_86(isr_regs_t *regs)
>> +{
>> + ++g_isr_86;
>> + set_irq_line(0x0e, 0);
>> + eoi();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void test_ioapic_logical_destination_mode(void)
>> +{
>> + /* Number of vcpus which are configured/set in dest_id */
>> + int nr_vcpus = 3;
>> + ioapic_redir_entry_t e = {
>> + .vector = 0x86,
>> + .delivery_mode = 0,
>> + .dest_mode = 1,
>> + .dest_id = 0xd,
>> + .trig_mode = TRIGGER_LEVEL,
>> + };
>> + handle_irq(0x86, ioapic_isr_86);
>> + ioapic_write_redir(0xe, e);
>> + set_irq_line(0x0e, 1);
>> + do {
>> + pause();
>> + } while(g_isr_86 < nr_vcpus);
>> + report("ioapic logical destination mode", g_isr_86 == nr_vcpus);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void update_cr3(void *cr3)
>> +{
>> + write_cr3((ulong)cr3);
>> +}
>>
>> int main(void)
>> {
>> setup_vm();
>> smp_init();
>>
>> + on_cpus(update_cr3, (void *)read_cr3());
>> mask_pic_interrupts();
>>
>> if (enable_x2apic())
>> @@ -448,7 +509,11 @@ int main(void)
>> test_ioapic_edge_tmr_smp(true);
>>
>> test_ioapic_self_reconfigure();
>> + test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode();
>> }
>>
>> + if (cpu_count() > 3)
>> + test_ioapic_logical_destination_mode();
>> +
>> return report_summary();
>> }
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Christophe de Dinechin (IRC c3d)
>
--
Thanks
Nitesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-06 12:47 [kvm-unit-tests Patch v1 0/2] x86: Test IOAPIC physical and logical destination mode Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-11-06 12:47 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v1 1/2] x86: ioapic: Add the smp configuration to ioapic unittest Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-11-06 12:47 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v1 2/2] x86: ioapic: Test physical and logical destination mode Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-11-28 6:38 ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-05 3:26 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-12-05 13:59 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-11-28 10:25 ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-12-05 3:28 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal [this message]
2019-11-22 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v1 0/2] x86: Test IOAPIC " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2019-11-22 19:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2019-11-23 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5fac8c7b-ddcd-de22-568d-bc7ab6c7c71f@redhat.com \
--to=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).